From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45864)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1auUem-0003ZY-4I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 20:45:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1auUei-0005E9-V3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 20:45:44 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38779)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1auUei-0005E5-Pn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 20:45:40 -0400
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:45:44 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160425004544.GB18010@ad.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <1461191272-17802-1-git-send-email-Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com>
	<20160421022237.GE24822@dhcp-14-234.nay.redhat.com>
	<CAE=NcrZfL9BYaJ11FTSn1CajYnyAQ5sKqZC+pqf1sLXOoWvedg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160421044401.GG24822@dhcp-14-234.nay.redhat.com>
	<CAE=NcrY+s+LOFnUs7yU=Ghoa940A99+zr2C--bDMN2v8RHSgYg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAE=NcrY+s+LOFnUs7yU=Ghoa940A99+zr2C--bDMN2v8RHSgYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Allow users to specify the vmdk virtual
 hardware version.
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, 04/22 08:23, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> >> That's certainly doable and kind of makes sense, but I'm not entirely
> >> sure that compat6 flag makes any sense to begin with. Does it?
> >
> > I don't know VMware products well enough to tell, but it has been available
> > since forever, therefore my suggestion is to just keep it which cannot hurt.
> 
> I sent the new patch yesterday with this option still present and it
> works the same as it always has. I also tested it to work on all
> option pairings, so it should be good to go AFAIK. Hope you have some
> time to check that.

Thanks for letting me know! I'll take a look soon. (Patches without correctly
Cc'ing maintainers are very easy to get neglected. Please remember to use
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl (or ./MAINTAINERS) next time.)

Fam