From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35703) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aujWy-0006vE-HD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:38:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aujWs-0003HC-Cp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:38:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aujWs-0003H4-79 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:38:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:38:28 +0200 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Message-ID: <20160425163828.GG2386@potion> References: <1461055122-32378-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <571DA823.1030003@web.de> <20160425071806.GF3261@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <571DC61C.9020006@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <571DC61C.9020006@web.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/16] IOMMU: Enable interrupt remapping for Intel IOMMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Peter Xu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, imammedo@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, ehabkost@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, marcel@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com 2016-04-25 09:24+0200, Jan Kiszka: > On 2016-04-25 09:18, Peter Xu wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:16:19AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2016-04-19 10:38, Peter Xu wrote: >>>> - EIM support >>> >>> That should be fairly easy, I already played with it (hack in EIM cap, >>> change vtd_remap_irq_get, assuming EIME would be set). However, it >>> depends on split irqchip to work properly (there is no x2apic in >>> userspace APIC), and that is not yet the case. >> >> That's cool. Never tried it though. Anyway, will leave x2apic >> related work for Radim. :) > > Whoever is faster ;) - I would really like to have this feature in order > to test x2apic support of Jailhouse also in the virtual test bed. Will > surely hack on it as soon as that other bug is fixed. I accept the challenge, and resign. :) Thanks!