From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avm1x-0001Xf-BI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:30:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avm1r-0000kS-FF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:30:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avm1r-0000jy-3W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:30:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:30:48 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20160428133048.GB4474@noname.redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] last call for bugs that need to be fixed for 2.6 release! List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers Am 18.04.2016 um 13:22 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben: > Hi; looking at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.6#Known_issues and > the mailing list we seem to be in reasonable shape for the 2.6 release. > I would ideally like the 2.6rc3 tarball which we will make later this > week to be the final one before full release. > > This is therefore the last call for any bugs that need to be fixed > for 2.6 or patches that must go in. If you have anything you think > should go into 2.6 please either add it to the "still unfixed in > master" part of the planning wiki page or follow up to this email to > describe it/link to the relevant patches/etc. This one fixes a crash with vvfat in rw mode, so it would probably be nice to have it in: [PATCH v2 1/2] vvfat: Fix volume name assertion The other patch in the series fixes a rather minor regression, so I don't have a strong opinion on whether to take it for 2.6 or not. In any case, the series still needs final review. Kevin