From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42581) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw5OG-00020E-OR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:11:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw5O5-00077S-9S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 06:11:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:01:08 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20160429100108.GD4350@noname.redhat.com> References: <1461346962-4676-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461346962-4676-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/13] block: Move I/O throttling to BlockBackend List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, berto@igalia.com, mreitz@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 22.04.2016 um 19:42 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben: > This is another feature that was "logically" part of the BlockBackend, but > implemented as a BlockDriverState feature. It was always kept on top using > swap_feature_fields(). > > This series moves it to be actually implemented in the BlockBackend, removing > another obstacle for removing bs->blk and allowing multiple BBs per BDS. > > Applies to block-next. Ping?