From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] block: Inactivate all children
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 12:12:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160504101242.GC14972@noname.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461030177-29144-3-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
Am 19.04.2016 um 03:42 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> Currently we only inactivate the top BDS. Actually bdrv_inactivate
> should be the opposite of bdrv_invalidate_cache.
>
> Recurse into the whole subtree instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Did you actually test this?
I would expect that bs->drv->bdrv_inactivate() fails now (as in
assertion failure) if it has anything to flush to the image because
bs->file has already be inactivated before. I think children need to be
inactived after their parents.
Nodes with multiple parents could actually become even more
interesting...
Kevin
> block.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index fa8b38f..9a84ed1 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -3260,8 +3260,16 @@ void bdrv_invalidate_cache_all(Error **errp)
>
> static int bdrv_inactivate(BlockDriverState *bs)
> {
> + BdrvChild *child;
> int ret;
>
> + QLIST_FOREACH(child, &bs->children, next) {
> + ret = bdrv_inactivate(child->bs);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (bs->drv->bdrv_inactivate) {
> ret = bs->drv->bdrv_inactivate(bs);
> if (ret < 0) {
> --
> 2.8.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-04 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-19 1:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] block: More complete inactivate/invalidate of on graph Fam Zheng
2016-04-19 1:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: Invalidate all children Fam Zheng
2016-04-19 8:44 ` Changlong Xie
2016-04-19 12:23 ` Fam Zheng
2016-05-04 10:10 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-05 0:32 ` Fam Zheng
2016-04-19 1:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] block: Inactivate " Fam Zheng
2016-05-04 10:12 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2016-05-05 0:32 ` Fam Zheng
2016-05-06 7:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-10 3:23 ` Fam Zheng
2016-05-10 8:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-11 1:51 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160504101242.GC14972@noname.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).