From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Marc Marí" <marc.mari.barcelo@gmail.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] Add optionrom compatible with fw_cfg DMA version
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 18:36:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160510173624.GB1683@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5732194C.3050000@redhat.com>
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:24:28PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 09/05/2016 18:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Of course we're well outside any standards here. Can we tell clang
> > users to use the GCC/pre-compiled option ROMs :-? Any other ideas? I
> > don't think I've missed a flag (GCC has -fno-toplevel-reorder, but
> > clang 3.8 doesn't ...)
>
> I guess the checksumming script (scripts/signrom.py) could take care of
> padding the file to a multiple of 512 bytes, and fill in the size in the
> third byte. Then "_end" would not be necessary anymore and -m16 could
> replace the .code16 directive.
In my rather limited testing on gcc, gcc -m16 broke booting. However
I've not investigated this further. I'll do so shortly.
However I have a question: is there a formal standard or documentation
for the option ROM format? Are we sticking to the (ancient) "BIOS Boot
Specification" or is there something newer? (My copy is from 1996).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-25 16:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] Add optionrom compatible with fw_cfg DMA version Richard W.M. Jones
2016-04-25 16:04 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-05-08 18:57 ` Marc Marí
2016-04-26 9:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-05-09 13:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-05-09 15:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-05-09 16:12 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-05-09 16:48 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-05-09 21:16 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-05-09 21:37 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2016-05-10 17:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-10 17:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-10 17:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones [this message]
2016-05-10 19:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160510173624.GB1683@redhat.com \
--to=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=marc.mari.barcelo@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).