qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 13:50:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160511115047.GC4524@noname.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160511013406.GC13488@ad.usersys.redhat.com>

Am 11.05.2016 um 03:34 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Tue, 05/03 16:39, Eric Blake wrote:
> > I noticed some inconsistencies in FUA handling while working
> > with NBD, then Kevin pointed out that my initial attempt wasn't
> > quite right for iscsi which also had problems, so this has
> > expanded into a series rather than a single patch.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if this is qemu-stable material at this point.
> > 
> > Depends on Kevin's block-next branch.
> > 
> > Also available as a tag at this location:
> > git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd-fua-v2
> > 
> > v1 was here:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-04/msg04674.html
> > 
> > diffstat not worth posting, as the series is basically rewritten
> > 
> > Eric Blake (3):
> >   block: Make supported_write_flags a per-bds property
> >   block: Honor BDRV_REQ_FUA during write_zeroes
> >   nbd: Simplify client FUA handling
> 
> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

Ah, sorry, forgot that you co-maintain this code now. So this is good
enough to merge the series. :-)

Thanks, applied to block-next.

Kevin

      reply	other threads:[~2016-05-11 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-03 22:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling Eric Blake
2016-05-03 22:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 1/3] block: Make supported_write_flags a per-bds property Eric Blake
2016-05-03 22:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 2/3] block: Honor BDRV_REQ_FUA during write_zeroes Eric Blake
2016-05-03 22:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 3/3] nbd: Simplify client FUA handling Eric Blake
2016-05-10 12:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling Kevin Wolf
2016-05-11 13:30   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-05-11  1:34 ` Fam Zheng
2016-05-11 11:50   ` Kevin Wolf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160511115047.GC4524@noname.str.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).