qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block: split write_zeroes always
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 18:34:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160517163431.GG9802@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463476543-3087-2-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>

Am 17.05.2016 um 11:15 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> We should split requests even if they are less than write_zeroes_alignment.
> For example we can have the following request:
>   offset 62k
>   size   4k
>   write_zeroes_alignment 64k
> The original code sent 1 request covering 2 qcow2 clusters, and resulted
> in both clusters being allocated. But by splitting the request, we can
> cater to the case where one of the two clusters can be zeroed as a
> whole, for only 1 cluster allocated after the operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
> CC: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/io.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> index cd6d71a..6a24ea8 100644
> --- a/block/io.c
> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -1172,13 +1172,13 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
>          /* Align request.  Block drivers can expect the "bulk" of the request
>           * to be aligned.
>           */
> -        if (bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment
> -            && num > bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment) {
> +        if (bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment) {
>              if (sector_num % bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment != 0) {
>                  /* Make a small request up to the first aligned sector.  */
>                  num = bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment;
>                  num -= sector_num % bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment;

Turns out this doesn't work. If this is a small request that zeros
something in the middle of a single cluster (i.e. we have untouched data
both before and after the request in the same cluster), then num can now
become greater than nb_sectors, so that we end up zeroing too much.

I'll send a test case that catches this and unstage the series for the
time being.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-17 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-17  9:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] qcow2_co_write_zeroes and related improvements Denis V. Lunev
2016-05-17  9:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] block: split write_zeroes always Denis V. Lunev
2016-05-17 16:34   ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2016-05-25 18:36     ` Eric Blake
2016-05-17  9:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] qcow2: simplify logic in qcow2_co_write_zeroes Denis V. Lunev
2016-05-17  9:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] qcow2: add tracepoints for qcow2_co_write_zeroes Denis V. Lunev
2016-05-17 15:37   ` Eric Blake
2016-05-17  9:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] qcow2: fix condition in is_zero_cluster Denis V. Lunev
2016-05-17 15:11   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-17  9:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] qcow2: merge is_zero_cluster helpers into qcow2_co_write_zeroes Denis V. Lunev
2016-05-24 18:14   ` Eric Blake
2016-05-17 15:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] qcow2_co_write_zeroes and related improvements Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160517163431.GG9802@noname.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).