From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40815)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1b4rhN-0005ML-De
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:23:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1b4rhH-0007vk-Iq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:23:16 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:47524)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cota@braap.org>) id 1b4rhF-0007qB-6k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:23:11 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:22:59 -0400
From: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>
Message-ID: <20160523152259.GA1768@flamenco>
References: <87a8jhdotl.fsf@linaro.org>
	<CAH47eN1ncuDYaRYYZeEsr+kmMQonuU6UjSpOTOq-7gCW4Sg2=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<878tz1djph.fsf@linaro.org> <5742FE28.3020601@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5742FE28.3020601@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Any topics for today's MTTCG sync-up call?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@huawei.com>
Cc: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, alvise rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>, MTTCG Devel <mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com>, Mark Burton <mark.burton@greensocs.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>, Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>, KONRAD =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 14:57:12 +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> Hi, at some point in the past there was a set of performance benchmarks
> which were showing the improvements using mttcg, is there some update
> on that?

Any scalable parallel workload should do.

I've used the C/C++ benchmarks in synchrobench[1] extensively for
scalability benchmarking. It's not cross-compile friendly though, so for
ARM I only managed to compile a subset of its benchmarks.

[1] https://github.com/gramoli/synchrobench

		Emilio