From: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mttcg@greensocs.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs/atomics: update comparison with Linux
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 11:15:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160525151525.GB4546@flamenco> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464179166-24137-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 14:26:06 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Over time, some differences between QEMU and Linux atomics are getting
> smoothed. In particular, Linux grew atomic_fetch_or (and in general
> the differences regarding RMW operations were not described accurately)
> and smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release. Also, set_mb was renamed to
> smp_store_mb(). Include these changes in the documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/atomics.txt | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/atomics.txt b/docs/atomics.txt
> index 67a27ad..3f8b770 100644
> --- a/docs/atomics.txt
> +++ b/docs/atomics.txt
> @@ -340,17 +340,27 @@ and memory barriers, and the equivalents in QEMU:
> properly aligned.
> No barriers are implied by atomic_read/set in either Linux or QEMU.
>
> -- most atomic read-modify-write operations in Linux return void;
> - in QEMU, all of them return the old value of the variable.
> +- atomic read-modify-write operations in Linux are of three kinds:
> +
> + atomic_OP returns void
> + atomic_OP_return returns new value of the variable
> + atomic_fetch_OP returns the old value of the variable
> + atomic_cmpxchg returns the old value of the variable
> +
> + In QEMU, the second kind does not exist. Currently Linux has
> + atomic_fetch_or only; QEMU provides all of inc, dec, and, sub, and, or.
Not clear whether the last 'and' is redundant or is being used as
a conjunction. Either way it would be clearer to just remove it.
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Emilio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-25 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-25 12:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs/atomics: update comparison with Linux Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-25 15:15 ` Emilio G. Cota [this message]
2016-05-25 15:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160525151525.GB4546@flamenco \
--to=cota@braap.org \
--cc=mttcg@greensocs.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).