From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] block/io: optimize bdrv_co_pwritev for small requests
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:30:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160526083016.GD31052@ad.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413c4af8-ba30-bfbf-9a84-d1d92ddac0e4@redhat.com>
On Thu, 05/26 09:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 26/05/2016 09:10, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> > index d480097..a6523cf 100644
> > --- a/block/io.c
> > +++ b/block/io.c
> > @@ -1435,8 +1435,10 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs,
> > * than one aligned block.
> > */
> > if (bytes < align) {
> > + bdrv_debug_event(bs, BLKDBG_PWRITEV_RMW_TAIL);
> > qemu_iovec_add(&local_qiov, head_buf + bytes, align - bytes);
> > bytes = align;
> > + bdrv_debug_event(bs, BLKDBG_PWRITEV_RMW_AFTER_TAIL);
> > }
> > }
>
> This doesn't look too wrong... Should the right sequence of events be
> head/after_head or head/after_tail? It's probably simplest to just emit
> all four events.
I've no idea. (That's why I leaned towards fixing the test case). But if Kevin
can ack, I'd be happy with this way.
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-26 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 14:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2] block/io: optimize bdrv_co_pwritev for small requests Peter Lieven
2016-05-24 15:07 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-26 6:50 ` Fam Zheng
2016-05-26 7:10 ` Fam Zheng
2016-05-26 7:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-26 8:30 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2016-05-26 9:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-27 0:36 ` Fam Zheng
2016-05-27 8:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-30 6:25 ` Peter Lieven
2016-05-30 8:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-30 9:30 ` Peter Lieven
2016-05-30 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-30 9:53 ` Peter Lieven
2016-05-30 10:06 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-05-30 10:10 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160526083016.GD31052@ad.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).