From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40141) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7hQ3-0005Yn-Md for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 07:01:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7hPx-0001Ux-Ot for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 07:01:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7hPx-0001Ut-JI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 07:01:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:00:58 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160531110058.GA24019@ad.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20160527135437.20474-1-famz@redhat.com> <20160527135437.20474-5-famz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 04/15] Makefile: Rules for docker testing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= On Tue, 05/31 10:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > diff --git a/tests/docker/Makefile.include b/tests/docker/Makefile.include > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..372733d > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/docker/Makefile.include > > @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ > > +# Makefile for Docker tests > > + > > +include $(SRC_PATH)/rules.mak > > Why include this _and_ include tests/docker/Makefile.include from the > top Makefile? This is for quiet-command, which is only conditionally included by top Makefile. > > I think you should do one of this: > > a) drop this inclusion; nice, but it pollutes the toplevel makefile a bit > > b) do the following: > > - link this file into the build tree in configure > > - include ../../config-host.mak I prefer we support running from the src tree without running configure, but $(MAKE) invocations doesn't propagate make variables such as SRC_PATH... > > - add to the toplevel Makefile a rule like > > docker docker-%: > $(MAKE) -C tests/docker $@ ... and explicitly passing it (and $(V), etc.) here seems very ad-hocery. > > I prefer the latter. Either would make patch 3 unnecessary. Maybe I should make patch 3 a patch to make top Makefile include rules.mak unconditionally? Fam