From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41200)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1b8fDQ-0006lL-UY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 22:52:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1b8fDP-0001aM-5c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 22:52:03 -0400
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:51:52 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160603025152.GH29298@ad.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <1464919622-4115-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
	<5750EE8B.30308@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5750EE8B.30308@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] raw-posix: Fetch max sectors for host
 block device
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

On Thu, 06/02 20:42, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 08:07 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > This is sometimes a useful value we should count in.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  block/raw-posix.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> > 
> 
> Will conflict with patches I'm about to post to rework BlockLimits to be
> byte-based, rather than a mix of byte- and sector values.  First one in
> gets to watch the other rebase :)

Thanks!  I'm looking forward to a byte based BlockLimits!

Fam