From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8yma-0007QA-QU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 19:45:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8ymY-000539-Eh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 07:45:27 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160603234527.GA3218@ad.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1464944872-24484-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <70297268-cb80-f2dd-4d9e-0cbb9b96198c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70297268-cb80-f2dd-4d9e-0cbb9b96198c@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: 095: Clean up QEMU before showing image info List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org On Fri, 06/03 16:52, Max Reitz wrote: > On 03.06.2016 11:07, Fam Zheng wrote: > > Somehow in my locking series, I missed this case where concurrent access > > to an image is performed, perhaps we can remove this case independently. > > The patch itself is good, but this commit message will not make much > sense in the git log. I'd be fine with removing it completely because > the title itself should be sufficient. (Which is something I can do in > case you agree.) Yes, agreed completely. Thanks! Fam