From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39907) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCnZw-0004Nx-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:36:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCnZq-0007oD-Ku for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:36:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCnZq-0007o8-FC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:36:18 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE672A0C8F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:36:14 -0400 From: Jeff Cody Message-ID: <20160614123614.GC823@localhost.localdomain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Regarding the status of Gluster's multi volfile server patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Prasanna Kalever Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Bose, Sahina" , Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay , eblake@redhat.com On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:27:55PM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > Hello, > > Can someone please help me in tracking the QAPI changes for union > discriminator addition, > the below [1] gluster related patches are awaiting from very long, > because of the dependency with QMP design changes. > > These patches [1] also stuck changes in libvirt/vdsm. It will be > really helpful for us, if someone can suggest what can be done to > accept this patches as early as possible. > > Many thanks in advance. > > [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg06324.html Hi Prasanna, The last I know, as of v15 / v16, is that the libvirt team (Eric Blake) still has outstanding concerns on the QAPI interface. Eric, are your concerns regarding the API for this series still outstanding, or is this something you'd be comfortable supporting in libvirt with the current proposed interface? Thanks, Jeff