qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] m25p80: fix test on blk_pread() return value
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:57:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615075704.GC4566@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57602AAC.1050304@kaod.org>

Am 14.06.2016 um 18:02 hat Cédric Le Goater geschrieben:
> On 06/14/2016 10:38 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 14.06.2016 um 10:02 hat Cédric Le Goater geschrieben:
> >>>> #4  0x00007fa81c6694ac in bdrv_aligned_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, req=<optimized out>, offset=30878208, 
> >>>>     bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa7f47fee60, flags=0)
> >>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1243
> >>>> #5  0x00007fa81c669ecb in bdrv_co_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, offset=8, bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa80d5191c0, 
> >>>>     flags=(BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ | BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE | BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP | BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING | BDRV_REQ_FUA | unknown: 4278124256), flags@entry=(unknown: 0))
> >>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1492
> >>>
> >>> That 'flags' value looks bogus...
> >>>
> >>>> #6  0x00007fa81c65e367 in blk_co_pwritev (blk=0x7fa81d4c5b60, offset=30878208, bytes=256, qiov=0x7fa80d5191c0, 
> >>>>     flags=(unknown: 0)) at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/block-backend.c:788
> >>>> #7  0x00007fa81c65e49b in blk_aio_write_entry (opaque=0x7fa7e849aca0)
> >>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/block-backend.c:977
> >>>> #8  0x00007fa81c6c823a in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, i1=<optimized out>)
> >>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/util/coroutine-ucontext.c:78
> >>>> #9  0x00007fa818ea8f00 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> >>>
> >>> and we don't get anything further in the backtrace beyond coroutines, to
> >>> see who's sending the bad parameters.  I recently debugged a bogus flags
> >>> in bdrv_aio_preadv, by hoisting an assert to occur before coroutines are
> >>> used in blk_aio_prwv():
> >>>
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg02948.html
> >>>
> >>> I've just posted v2 of that patch (now a 2/2 series), but in v2 no
> >>> longer kept the assert at that point.  But maybe the correct fix, and/or
> >>> the hack for catching the bug prior to coroutines, will help you debug
> >>> where the bad arguments are coming from.
> >>
> >> That does not fix the assert.
> >>  
> >>>> #10 0x00007fa80d5189d0 in ?? ()
> >>>> #11 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >>>> (gdb) up 4
> >>>> #4  0x00007fa81c6694ac in bdrv_aligned_pwritev (bs=0x7fa81d4dd050, req=<optimized out>, offset=30878208, 
> >>>>     bytes=512, qiov=0x7fa7f47fee60, flags=0)
> >>>>     at /home/legoater/work/qemu/qemu-ast2400-mainline.git/block/io.c:1243
> >>>> 1243	    assert(!qiov || bytes == qiov->size);
> >>>> (gdb) p *qiov 
> >>>> $1 = {iov = 0x7fa81da671d0, niov = 1, nalloc = 1, size = 256}
> >>
> >> So, it seems that the issue is coming from the fact that bdrv_co_pwritev()
> >> does not handle alignments less than BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE :
> >>
> >> 	/* TODO Lift BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE restriction in BlockDriver interface */
> >> 	uint64_t align = MAX(BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, bs->request_alignment);
> >>
> >> It calls bdrv_aligned_pwritev() which does the assert : 
> >>
> >> 	assert(!qiov || bytes == qiov->size);
> > 
> > Yes, but between these two places, there is code that should actually
> > enforce the right alignment:
> > 
> >     if ((offset + bytes) & (align - 1)) {
> >         ...
> >     }
> > 
> > You can see in your backtrace that bdrv_aligned_pwritev() gets a
> > different qiov than bdrv_co_pwritev() (which is local_qiov in the latter
> > function).
> > 
> > It's just unclear to me why this code extended bytes, but didn't add the
> > tail_buf iovec to local_qiov.
> 
> The gdb backtrace is bogus. It does not make sense. May be a gdb issue
> with multithread on jessie.
> 
> In the path tracking the tail bytes, we have : 
> 
>      if ((offset + bytes) & (align - 1)) {
> 	...
          if (!use_local_qiov) {
              qemu_iovec_init(&local_qiov, qiov->niov + 1);
              qemu_iovec_concat(&local_qiov, qiov, 0, qiov->size);
              use_local_qiov = true;
          }
>         tail_bytes = (offset + bytes) & (align - 1);
>         qemu_iovec_add(&local_qiov, tail_buf + tail_bytes, align - tail_bytes);
> 
>         bytes = ROUND_UP(bytes, align);
>     }
> 
> This is where the issue is I think. The qiov holds 256 and bytes 512.
> 
> I have no idea how to fix that though.

Added some more context above. qiov->size as passed from the device is
already 256 bytes, which are added to local_qiov with
qemu_iovec_concat(). And then we add another 256 from tail_buf in the
lines that you quoted, so in theory we should end up with a properly
aligned 256 + 256 = 512 byte qiov.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-15  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-31 11:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] m25p80: fix test on blk_pread() return value Cédric Le Goater
2016-05-31 14:26 ` Eric Blake
2016-05-31 14:29   ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-05-31 14:36     ` Eric Blake
2016-06-13 16:25       ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-13 16:47         ` Eric Blake
2016-06-13 17:43           ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-13 18:56             ` Eric Blake
2016-06-14  8:02               ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-14  8:38                 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-14 16:02                   ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-15  7:57                     ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2016-06-15 13:36                       ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-15 17:03           ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-06-14  8:54   ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160615075704.GC4566@noname.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).