From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDQEN-0001UD-0h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:52:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDQEL-000725-9t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:52:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:52:27 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160616055226.GA13794@ad.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1465939839-30097-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> <1465939839-30097-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1465939839-30097-18-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 17/17] block: Move request_alignment into BlockLimit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , Ronnie Sahlberg , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Lieven On Tue, 06/14 15:30, Eric Blake wrote: > It makes more sense to have ALL block size limit constraints > in the same struct. Improve the documentation while at it. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng