qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"eddie . dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
	Yang Hongyang <hongyang.yang@easystack.cn>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/3] filter-rewriter: rewrite tcp packet to keep secondary connection
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:14:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620121402.GC2891@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57678CDA.7020700@redhat.com>

* Jason Wang (jasowang@redhat.com) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2016年06月14日 19:15, Zhang Chen wrote:
> > We will rewrite tcp packet secondary received and sent.
> 
> More verbose please. E.g which fields were rewrote and why.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >   net/filter-rewriter.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >   trace-events          |  3 ++
> >   2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/filter-rewriter.c b/net/filter-rewriter.c
> > index 12f88c5..86a2f53 100644
> > --- a/net/filter-rewriter.c
> > +++ b/net/filter-rewriter.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >   #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
> >   #include "qemu/iov.h"
> >   #include "net/checksum.h"
> > +#include "trace.h"
> >   #define FILTER_COLO_REWRITER(obj) \
> >       OBJECT_CHECK(RewriterState, (obj), TYPE_FILTER_REWRITER)
> > @@ -64,6 +65,75 @@ static int is_tcp_packet(Packet *pkt)
> >       }
> >   }
> > +static int handle_primary_tcp_pkt(NetFilterState *nf,
> > +                                  Connection *conn,
> > +                                  Packet *pkt)
> > +{
> > +    struct tcphdr *tcp_pkt;
> > +
> > +    tcp_pkt = (struct tcphdr *)pkt->transport_layer;
> > +
> > +    if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_FILTER_REWRITER_DEBUG)) {
> 
> Why not use tracepoints directly?

Because trace can't cope with you having to do an allocation/free.

> > +        char *sdebug, *ddebug;
> > +        sdebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(pkt->ip->ip_src));
> > +        ddebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(pkt->ip->ip_dst));
> > +        fprintf(stderr, "%s: src/dst: %s/%s p: seq/ack=%u/%u"
> > +                "  flags=%x\n", __func__, sdebug, ddebug,
> > +                ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_seq), ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_ack),
> > +                tcp_pkt->th_flags);

However, this should use the trace_ call to write the result even if it's
using trace_event_get_state to switch the whole block on/off.

> > +        g_free(sdebug);
> > +        g_free(ddebug);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (((tcp_pkt->th_flags & (TH_ACK | TH_SYN)) == TH_ACK)) {
> > +        /* save primary colo tcp packet seq */
> > +        conn->primary_seq = ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_ack) - 1;
> 
> Looks like primary_seq will only be updated during handshake, I wonder how
> this works.

This code really needs commenting to make it see what's going on; each
of these functions should say which way the packet is going (e.g.
 'handle packets to the primary from the secondary') - there's a lot
of packet flows going on and without the comments it's very hard to follow.

I think this could be because we're fixing up the sequence numbers on the 
secondary once we've received the first response from the primary, so it's
only the first packet of each connection that the primary has to do this on -
but hmm I'm not sure without some comments.

Dave

> > +
> > +        /* adjust tcp seq to make secondary guest handle it */
> > +        tcp_pkt->th_ack = htonl(conn->secondary_seq + 1);
> 
> I'm not sure this can work for all cases. I believe we should also rewrite
> seq here. And to me, a better approach is to track the offset of seq between
> pri and sec during handshake and rewrite both ack and seq based on this
> offset.
> 
> > +        net_checksum_calculate((uint8_t *)pkt->data, pkt->size);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int handle_secondary_tcp_pkt(NetFilterState *nf,
> > +                                    Connection *conn,
> > +                                    Packet *pkt)
> > +{
> > +    struct tcphdr *tcp_pkt;
> > +
> > +    tcp_pkt = (struct tcphdr *)pkt->transport_layer;
> > +
> > +    if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_FILTER_REWRITER_DEBUG)) {
> > +        char *sdebug, *ddebug;
> > +        sdebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(pkt->ip->ip_src));
> > +        ddebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(pkt->ip->ip_dst));
> > +        printf("handle_secondary_tcp_pkt conn->secondary_seq = %u,\n",
> > +               conn->secondary_seq);
> > +        printf("handle_secondary_tcp_pkt conn->primary_seq = %u,\n",
> > +               conn->primary_seq);
> > +        fprintf(stderr, "%s: src/dst: %s/%s p: seq/ack=%u/%u"
> > +                "  flags=%x\n", __func__, sdebug, ddebug,
> > +                ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_seq), ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_ack),
> > +                tcp_pkt->th_flags);
> > +        g_free(sdebug);
> > +        g_free(ddebug);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (((tcp_pkt->th_flags & (TH_ACK | TH_SYN)) == (TH_ACK | TH_SYN))) {
> > +        /* save client's seq */
> > +        conn->secondary_seq = ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_seq);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if ((tcp_pkt->th_flags & (TH_ACK | TH_SYN)) == TH_ACK) {
> > +        tcp_pkt->th_seq = htonl(conn->primary_seq + 1);
> > +        net_checksum_calculate((uint8_t *)pkt->data, pkt->size);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static ssize_t colo_rewriter_receive_iov(NetFilterState *nf,
> >                                            NetClientState *sender,
> >                                            unsigned flags,
> > @@ -106,10 +176,30 @@ static ssize_t colo_rewriter_receive_iov(NetFilterState *nf,
> >           if (sender == nf->netdev) {
> >               /* This packet is sent by netdev itself */
> >               /* NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_TX */
> > -            /* handle_primary_tcp_pkt */
> > +            if (!handle_primary_tcp_pkt(nf, conn, pkt)) {
> > +                qemu_net_queue_send(s->incoming_queue, sender, 0,
> > +                (const uint8_t *)pkt->data, pkt->size, NULL);
> > +                packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
> > +                pkt = NULL;
> > +                /*
> > +                 * We block the packet here,after rewrite pkt
> > +                 * and will send it
> > +                 */
> > +                return 1;
> > +            }
> >           } else {
> >               /* NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_RX */
> > -            /* handle_secondary_tcp_pkt */
> > +            if (!handle_secondary_tcp_pkt(nf, conn, pkt)) {
> > +                qemu_net_queue_send(s->incoming_queue, sender, 0,
> > +                (const uint8_t *)pkt->data, pkt->size, NULL);
> > +                packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
> > +                pkt = NULL;
> > +                /*
> > +                 * We block the packet here,after rewrite pkt
> > +                 * and will send it
> > +                 */
> > +                return 1;
> > +            }
> >           }
> >       }
> > diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
> > index 6686cdf..5d798c6 100644
> > --- a/trace-events
> > +++ b/trace-events
> > @@ -1927,3 +1927,6 @@ colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_mtu(const char *sta, int size) ": %s  %d"
> >   colo_compare_ip_info(int psize, const char *sta, const char *stb, int ssize, const char *stc, const char *std) "ppkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s, spkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s"
> >   colo_old_packet_check_found(int64_t old_time) "%" PRId64
> >   colo_compare_miscompare(void) ""
> > +
> > +# net/filter-rewriter.c
> > +colo_filter_rewriter_debug(void) ""
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-20 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-14 11:15 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] filter-rewriter: introduce filter-rewriter Zhang Chen
2016-06-14 11:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] filter-rewriter: introduce filter-rewriter initialization Zhang Chen
2016-06-14 11:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/3] filter-rewriter: track connection and parse packet Zhang Chen
2016-06-14 11:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/3] filter-rewriter: rewrite tcp packet to keep secondary connection Zhang Chen
2016-06-20  6:27   ` Jason Wang
2016-06-20 12:14     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2016-06-22  3:12       ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-22  6:34         ` Jason Wang
2016-06-23 10:48           ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-24  6:08             ` Jason Wang
2016-06-28  6:33               ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-29  1:55                 ` Jason Wang
2016-06-29  6:13                   ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-30 12:17                     ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160620121402.GC2891@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=hongyang.yang@easystack.cn \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).