qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] BIT_RANGE convenience macro
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:11:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620141153.GD2891@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA__KvWCrKFehzdOQj9pqJ29+9Nz-4TyVk7RJ4jbO0G85g@mail.gmail.com>

* Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> On 16 June 2016 at 18:12, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
> <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> >
> > e.g. BIT_RANGE(15, 0) gives 0xff00
> >
> > Suggested by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/qemu/bitops.h | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/qemu/bitops.h b/include/qemu/bitops.h
> > index 755fdd1..e411688 100644
> > --- a/include/qemu/bitops.h
> > +++ b/include/qemu/bitops.h
> > @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
> >  #define BIT_MASK(nr)            (1UL << ((nr) % BITS_PER_LONG))
> >  #define BIT_WORD(nr)            ((nr) / BITS_PER_LONG)
> >  #define BITS_TO_LONGS(nr)       DIV_ROUND_UP(nr, BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(long))
> > +/* e.g. BIT_RANGE(15, 0) -> 0xff00 */
> > +#define BIT_RANGE(hb, lb)     ((2ull << (hb)) - (1ull << (lb)))
> 
> Isn't this undefined behaviour if the hb is 63?

I've checked the C99 spec; it explicitly defines the unsigned
behaviour ('reduced modulo one more than the maximum value representable in the result type').

> Also there is semantic overlap with the MAKE_64BIT_MASK macro
> proposed in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-05/msg02154.html
> (which also has ub, but see
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg02614.html
> for the version which doesn't).
> 
> I prefer a "start, length" macro to "position, position",
> because this matches what we already have for the deposit
> and extract functions in this header.

I think it depends on the use; I agree that makes sense
for things like extracting an n-bit integer; in this case
what we have is something which is fixed at bit 51 and
another bit - we dont ever think about the difference between
those two bits.

Dave

> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-20 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-16 17:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] x86: Physical address limit patches Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] BIT_RANGE convenience macro Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 17:23   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16 17:24     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-16 18:01   ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-16 18:05     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-20 14:11     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2016-06-20 14:17       ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] x86: Mask mtrr mask based on CPU physical address limits Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 19:59   ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17  8:23     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-17 12:13     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] x86: fill high bits of mtrr mask Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 20:14   ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17  7:47     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 12:46       ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 13:01         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 13:41           ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 14:25             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 15:27               ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 15:29                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 15:35                   ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 13:51           ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-17 14:19             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17  8:53     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 17:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16 18:09     ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-16 20:24   ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17  8:15     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-17  8:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17  9:17         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-17  9:52           ` Igor Mammedov
2016-06-17 11:20             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-17 16:20               ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-06-17 16:07             ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-06-19 16:13               ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-06-20 10:42                 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-06-20 11:13                   ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-06-17  9:37       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-17  9:54         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 13:18       ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 13:38         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 15:19           ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 15:28             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 15:49               ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-21 19:44                 ` [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set) Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-22 12:41                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 14:24                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-22 14:33                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 14:44                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-22 14:48                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 15:02                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-22 22:44                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-22 23:23                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-22 23:45                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-23  8:40                             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-23 16:38                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-24  5:55                                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-24 23:12                                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-29 16:42                               ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-30  6:10                                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-30 10:59                                   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-30 16:14                                     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-30 17:12                                       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-07-01 19:03                                       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-22 22:40                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-22 23:15                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-19  3:36           ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-20  7:04             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 14:24         ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] x86: Set physical address bits based on host Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-17  7:25   ` Igor Mammedov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160620141153.GD2891@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).