qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
	Evgeny Yakovlev <eyakovlev@virtuozzo.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] block: ignore flush requests when storage is clean
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:57:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160621085704.GB4520@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5768F811.5080105@openvz.org>

Am 21.06.2016 um 10:17 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> On 06/21/2016 10:45 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >Am 21.06.2016 um 09:32 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> >>
> >>On 20/06/2016 17:19, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> >>>+    /* Check if storage is actually dirty before flushing to disk */
> >>>+    if (!bs->dirty) {
> >>>+        goto flush_parent;
> >>>+    }
> >>>+    bs->dirty = false;
> >>>+
> >>This should be cleared after the flush is complete.  If you have
> >>
> >>     write begin
> >>     write end
> >>     flush #1 begin
> >>     flush #2 begin
> >>
> >>Then the second flush must only return after the first has finished.
> >I think clearing bs->dirty after the flush completion wouldn't
> >necessarily be right either if there are concurrent writes in flight, as
> >only completed writes are guaranteed to be flushed by it.
> >
> >Kevin
> this is not a problem if flush 2 will return after flush 1.
> This will mean that all writes prior to both flushes
> will land to the disk.

We need to be careful in cases like this:

start + complete write #1
start flush #1
start + complete write #2
start flush #2
complete flush #1
complete flush #2

Here letting flush #2 wait for flush #1 isn't enough because that one
only guarantees to flush write #1, but not write #2. However, flush #2
is required to flush write #2, too.

> Keeping this in mind dirty should be cleared before
> flush operation start.

Yes, if you do it like this, so that flush #2 ends up being an actual
flush instead of just waiting for flush #1, we're good.

Kevin

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-21  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-20 15:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] block: ignore flush requests when storage is clean Denis V. Lunev
2016-06-20 22:33 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-21  7:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-21  7:41   ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-06-21  7:45   ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-21  8:17     ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-06-21  8:57       ` Kevin Wolf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160621085704.GB4520@noname.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=eyakovlev@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).