From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
Evgeny Yakovlev <eyakovlev@virtuozzo.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] block: ignore flush requests when storage is clean
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:57:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160621085704.GB4520@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5768F811.5080105@openvz.org>
Am 21.06.2016 um 10:17 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> On 06/21/2016 10:45 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >Am 21.06.2016 um 09:32 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> >>
> >>On 20/06/2016 17:19, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> >>>+ /* Check if storage is actually dirty before flushing to disk */
> >>>+ if (!bs->dirty) {
> >>>+ goto flush_parent;
> >>>+ }
> >>>+ bs->dirty = false;
> >>>+
> >>This should be cleared after the flush is complete. If you have
> >>
> >> write begin
> >> write end
> >> flush #1 begin
> >> flush #2 begin
> >>
> >>Then the second flush must only return after the first has finished.
> >I think clearing bs->dirty after the flush completion wouldn't
> >necessarily be right either if there are concurrent writes in flight, as
> >only completed writes are guaranteed to be flushed by it.
> >
> >Kevin
> this is not a problem if flush 2 will return after flush 1.
> This will mean that all writes prior to both flushes
> will land to the disk.
We need to be careful in cases like this:
start + complete write #1
start flush #1
start + complete write #2
start flush #2
complete flush #1
complete flush #2
Here letting flush #2 wait for flush #1 isn't enough because that one
only guarantees to flush write #1, but not write #2. However, flush #2
is required to flush write #2, too.
> Keeping this in mind dirty should be cleared before
> flush operation start.
Yes, if you do it like this, so that flush #2 ends up being an actual
flush instead of just waiting for flush #1, we're good.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-21 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-20 15:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] block: ignore flush requests when storage is clean Denis V. Lunev
2016-06-20 22:33 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-21 7:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-21 7:41 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-06-21 7:45 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-06-21 8:17 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-06-21 8:57 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160621085704.GB4520@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=eyakovlev@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).