From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43210)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>) id 1bGQnH-0001lj-7g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:05:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>) id 1bGQnA-0001uh-Ic
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:05:10 -0400
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:57777)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>) id 1bGQnA-0001uV-AU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:05:04 -0400
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
	by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id
	u5OD45fX057636
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:05:02 -0400
Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110])
	by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 23rskwpq4u-1
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:05:02 -0400
Received: from localhost
	by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use
	Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> from <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>;
	Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:04:59 +0100
Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
	(d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198])
	by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295E817D806A
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:06:14 +0100 (BST)
Received: from d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
	[9.149.37.229])
	by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with
	ESMTP id u5OD4uQC7930118
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:04:56 GMT
Received: from d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by d06av05.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with
	ESMTP id u5OD4t8d017202
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:04:55 -0600
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:04:52 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFZJSOcZJimmNeRrj2hE0zkq24e7J0iP3ruZcAyQe=yHK0OSig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1466179394-4744-1-git-send-email-c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com>
	<1466179394-4744-2-git-send-email-c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com>
	<20160623185710.GA4121@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
	<CAFZJSOcZJimmNeRrj2hE0zkq24e7J0iP3ruZcAyQe=yHK0OSig@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20160624150452.6d5284db.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [virtio-dev][RFC 1/2] content: reserve virtio
 device ID
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Christian Pinto <c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com>, VirtualOpenSystems Technical Team <tech@virtualopensystems.com>, Claudio Fontana <Claudio.Fontana@huawei.com>, Jani Kokkonen <Jani.Kokkonen@huawei.com>

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:45:29 +0200
Christian Pinto <c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:03:13PM +0200, Christian Pinto wrote:

> > > @@ -2990,6 +2990,8 @@ Device ID  &  Virtio Device    \\
> > >  \hline
> > >  18         &   Input device \\
> > >  \hline
> > > +19         &   Signal Distribution Module \\
> > > +\hline
> >
> > Please use a higher number, 19 is already proposed for virtio-vsock:
> > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201603/msg00042.html
> 
> 
> Thanks, I will use 20 then.

I think virtio-crypto already wants to use 20. We sadly have a bit of a
backlog...