From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 02:12:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160624231224.GA12920@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466747733.16435.7.camel@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:55:33AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Do, 2016-06-23 at 19:38 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:40:03AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > > Well the crash of guest phys bits > host phys bits, should be easy to
> > > > > reproduce by booting a 65GB guest on a 64GB RAM + 2GB swap host with
> > > > > 36 host phys bits using the upstream qemu that forces the guest phys
> > > > > bits to 40.
> > > >
> > > > So you supply more RAM than host can address, and guest crashes?
> > >
> > > Yep. The only reason we don't see this happening in practice is that
> > > it's probably next to impossible to find a machine which has (a) only 36
> > > physical address lines and (b) allows to plug that much RAM.
> > >
> > > > Why are we worried about it?
> > >
> > > It's more a issue with pci ressources. In theory seabios/edk2 could go
> > > figure how big the physical address space is, then map 64bit pci bars as
> > > high as possible, thereby making stuff like etc/reserved-memory-end in
> > > fw_cfg unnecessary.
> > >
> > > But with qemu saying 40 phys bits are available even if they are not
> > > this approach isn't going to fly ...
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > Gerd
> >
> > Nah, x86 guests really need to go by _CRS.
>
> Yep, we can implement the "soft-phys-bits" that way.
The advantage being no guest changes are necessary. Guests
already use _CRS.
> > bios doesn't want to parse that
> > so it can go by some fw cfg file instead.
>
> firmware can't use it anyway because the firmware first maps the bars,
> the loads acpi tables (while qemu generates _CRS entries according to
> the bios mappings).
>
> > Going by phys bits won't work on old qemu so I don't believe it's
> > practical.
>
> Indeed, so I guess we'll have to stick to the current approach of
> mapping 64bit bars above ram (or etc/reserved-memory-end if present).
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-24 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-16 17:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] x86: Physical address limit patches Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] BIT_RANGE convenience macro Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 17:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16 17:24 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-16 18:01 ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-16 18:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-20 14:11 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-20 14:17 ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] x86: Mask mtrr mask based on CPU physical address limits Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 19:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 8:23 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-17 12:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] x86: fill high bits of mtrr mask Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 20:14 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 7:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 12:46 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 13:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 13:41 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 14:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 15:27 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 15:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 15:35 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 13:51 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-17 14:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 8:53 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-16 17:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16 18:09 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-16 20:24 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 8:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-17 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 9:17 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-17 9:52 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-06-17 11:20 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-17 16:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-06-17 16:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-06-19 16:13 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-06-20 10:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-06-20 11:13 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-06-17 9:37 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-17 9:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 13:18 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 13:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 15:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-17 15:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 15:49 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-21 19:44 ` [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set) Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-22 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 14:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-22 14:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 14:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-22 14:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 15:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-22 22:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-22 23:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-22 23:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-23 8:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-23 16:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-24 5:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-24 23:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-06-29 16:42 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-30 6:10 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-30 10:59 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-30 16:14 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-06-30 17:12 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-07-01 19:03 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-22 22:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-22 23:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-19 3:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-20 7:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-17 14:24 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2016-06-16 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] x86: Set physical address bits based on host Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2016-06-17 7:25 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160624231224.GA12920@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).