From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Prerna Saxena <saxenap.ltc@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Prerna Saxena <prerna.saxena@nutanix.com>,
anilkumar.boggarapu@nutanix.com, felipe.francoisi@nutanix.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] vhost-user: Add a protocol extension for client responses to vhost commands.
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 01:43:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160625014043-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466756228-27490-1-git-send-email-saxenap.ltc@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:17:07AM -0700, Prerna Saxena wrote:
> From: Prerna Saxena <prerna.saxena@nutanix.com>
>
> The current vhost-user protocol requires the client to send responses to only few commands. For the remaining commands, it is impossible for QEMU to know the status of the requested operation -- ie, did it succeed at all, and if so, at what time.
>
> This is inconvenient, and can also lead to races. As an example:
>
> (1) qemu sends a SET_MEM_TABLE to the backend (eg, a vhost-user net application) and SET_MEM_TABLE doesn't require a reply according to the spec.
> (2) qemu commits the memory to the guest.
> (3) guest issues an I/O operation over a new memory region which was configured on (1)
> (4) The application hasn't yet remapped the memory, but it sees the I/O request.
> (5) The application cannot satisfy the request because it doesn't know about those GPAs
OK, but there's a simple way to fix the race: submit
another request e.g. GET_FEATURES and wait for a response.
>
> Note that the kernel implementation does not suffer from this limitation since messages are sent via an ioctl(). The ioctl() blocks until the backend (eg. vhost-net) completes the command and returns (with an error code).
>
> Changing the behaviour of current vhost-user commands would break existing applications. This patch introduces a protocol extension, VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK. This feature, if negotiated, allows QEMU to annotate messages to the application that it seeks a response for. The application must then respond to qemu by providing a status about the requested operation.
I would like this structured like this:
1. fix races by sending GET_FEATURES and waiting for it
2. add VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK
>
> Prerna Saxena (1):
> vhost-user : Introduce a new feature, VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK
> This feature, if negotiated, forces the remote vhost-user
> process to send a u64 reply containin status code for each
> requested operation.
> Status codes are '0' for success, and non-zero for error.
>
> docs/specs/vhost-user.txt | 36 +++++++++++
> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-24 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-24 8:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] vhost-user: Add a protocol extension for client responses to vhost commands Prerna Saxena
2016-06-24 8:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] vhost-user : Introduce a new feature VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK. This feature, if negotiated, forces the remote vhost-user process to send a u64 reply containing a status code for each requested operation. Status codes are '0' for success, and non-zero for error Prerna Saxena
2016-06-24 8:35 ` Prerna
2016-06-24 22:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-24 8:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] vhost-user: Add a protocol extension for client responses to vhost commands Prerna
2016-06-24 13:59 ` Marc-André Lureau
2016-06-24 15:45 ` Felipe Franciosi
2016-06-24 17:39 ` Prerna Saxena
2016-06-24 23:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-25 3:13 ` Prerna Saxena
2016-06-26 2:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-26 2:48 ` Prerna Saxena
2016-06-26 2:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-24 22:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-06-27 10:45 ` Felipe Franciosi
2016-06-27 11:47 ` Marc-André Lureau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160625014043-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=anilkumar.boggarapu@nutanix.com \
--cc=felipe.francoisi@nutanix.com \
--cc=prerna.saxena@nutanix.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=saxenap.ltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).