From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKohP-0004ly-Ne for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:25:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKohK-0001rV-27 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:25:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:24:58 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20160706152458.GI5233@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <1467818447-2728-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1467818447-2728-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] block: Accept node-name in all node level QMP commands List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: mreitz@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 06.07.2016 um 17:20 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben: > As stated in the RFC I sent two weeks ago: > > * Node level commands: We need to complete the conversion that makes > commands accept node names instead of BlockBackend names. In some places > we intentionally allow only BlockBackends because we don't know if the > command works in other places than the root. This is okay, but we can > accept node names anyway. We just need to check that the node is a root > node as expected. > > This part of the RFC is implemented by this series. Sorry, this should still be RFC. I haven't updated the documentation for most commands yet, but the implementation and tests should be ready. Kevin