qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/11] block: Accept node-name for block-stream
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:01:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160708100112.GH14684@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <577EDB7D.6030102@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1370 bytes --]

Am 08.07.2016 um 00:45 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 07/07/2016 06:11 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> > external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> > block-stream to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
> > we're operating at a root node.
> > 
> > In case of an invalid device name, the command returns the GenericError
> > error class now instead of DeviceNotFound, because this is what
> > qmp_get_root_bs() returns.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  blockdev.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  qapi/block-core.json   |  5 +----
> >  qmp-commands.hx        |  2 +-
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/030 |  2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> The interface change looks okay; but due to Berto's comments, I'm not
> sure it is worth giving R-b yet if you plan on changing the check for
> whether a node name properly qualifies as a root name.

Initially I intended to address the comment with some change, but since
I realised that you already can put a BB everywhere and therefore this
doesn't protect anything against intentional actions anyway, I'm not so
sure any more.

Do you have an opintion on this? More input would be appreciated.

Kevin

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-08 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-07 12:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/11] block: Accept node-name in all node level QMP commands Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/11] block: Accept node-name for block-stream Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:59   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Alberto Garcia
2016-07-07 14:17     ` Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 14:39       ` Alberto Garcia
2016-07-07 14:49         ` Kevin Wolf
2016-07-13  9:46       ` Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 22:45   ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2016-07-08 10:01     ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2016-07-08 14:30       ` Eric Blake
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/11] block: Accept node-name for block-commit Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 22:52   ` Eric Blake
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/11] block: Accept node-name for blockdev-backup Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/11] block: Accept node-name for blockdev-mirror Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/11] block: Accept node-name for blockdev-snapshot-delete-internal-sync Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/11] block: Accept node-name for blockdev-snapshot-internal-sync Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/11] block: Accept node-name for change-backing-file Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/11] block: Accept node-name for drive-backup Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/11] block: Accept node-name for drive-mirror Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/11] nbd-server: Use a separate BlockBackend Kevin Wolf
2016-07-07 12:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/11] nbd-server: Allow node name for nbd-server-add Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160708100112.GH14684@noname.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).