From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, imammedo@redhat.com,
nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] spapr: Set stable_cpu_id for threads of CPU cores
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:24:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160708172424.0f37f508@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160708075907.GS14675@voom.fritz.box>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6028 bytes --]
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:59:07 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:46:47AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:25:33 +1000
> > David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:11:31PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:20:23 +0530
> > > > Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Conditonally set stable_cpu_id for CPU threads that are created as part
> > > > > of spapr CPU cores. The use of stable_cpu_id is enabled for pseries-2.7
> > > > > onwards.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The last sentence is a bit confusing since the enablement actually happens
> > > > in patch 5/5.
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > > index b104778..0ec3513 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > > @@ -293,8 +293,15 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > > > > for (i = 0; i < cc->nr_threads; i++) {
> > > > > char id[32];
> > > > > obj = sc->threads + i * size;
> > > > > + CPUState *cs;
> > > > >
> > > > > object_initialize(obj, size, typename);
> > > > > + cs = CPU(obj);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Use core_id (which is actually cpu_dt_id) as stable CPU id */
> > > >
> > > > It isn't what I had in mind. More something like below:
> > > >
> > > > In ppc_spapr_init():
> > > >
> > > > for (i = 0; i < spapr_max_cores; i++) {
> > > > spapr->cores[i]->stable_id = i * smp_threads;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In spapr_cpu_core_realize():
> > > >
> > > > for (j = 0; j < cc->nr_threads; j++) {
> > > > stable_cpu_id = cc->stable_id + j;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > So we need to introduce cc->stable_id.
> > >
> > > No, we don't. Cores have had a stable ID since they were introduced.
> > >
> >
> > I agree core_dt_id is stable but it is a DT concept.
>
> There is no core_dt_id. There's just core-id, which is machine
> assigned (via the query hotpluggable cpus interface) and stable.
>
> > static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> > {
> > [...]
> > for (i = 0; i < spapr_max_cores; i++) {
> > int core_dt_id = i * smt;
>
> ..uh, ok, except for that poorly named variable. But that's because
> this is in the machine type, and it knows it's going to use the same
> ids to give to the core object and to put in the device tree.
>
It is core_id everywhere else.
$ git grep core_id hw/ppc/
hw/ppc/spapr.c: cpu_props->has_core_id = true;
hw/ppc/spapr.c: cpu_props->core_id = i * smt;
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c: spapr->cores[cc->core_id / smt] = NULL;
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c: drc = spapr_dr_connector_by_id(SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU, cc->core_id);
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c: index = cc->core_id / smt;
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c: if (cc->core_id % smt) {
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c: error_setg(&local_err, "invalid core id %d\n", cc->core_id);
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c: index = cc->core_id / smt;
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c: error_setg(&local_err, "core id %d out of range", cc->core_id);
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c: error_setg(&local_err, "core %d already populated", cc->core_id);
$ git grep core_dt_id hw/ppc/
hw/ppc/spapr.c: int core_dt_id = i * smt;
hw/ppc/spapr.c: SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU, core_dt_id);
hw/ppc/spapr.c: object_property_set_int(core, core_dt_id, CPU_CORE_PROP_CORE_ID,
I got confused because the current code still puts cpu_dt_id of thread0 in the
device tree. And since cpu_dt_id is still being computed on cpu_index, it is
a different beast (which needs to be killed since it even crashes simple
hotplug/unplug scenarios).
> > [...]
> > object_property_set_int(core, core_dt_id, CPU_CORE_PROP_CORE_ID,
> > &error_fatal);
> >
> > This patch produces stable_cpu_id in the [0...smt * smp_cores) range. I find it
> > awkward it depends on the host setup.
>
> True. Possibly we should set these as i * (maximum plausible number
> of threads).
>
> The gotcha is that currently we're using the same "dt_id" to control
> KVM's cpu id and that in turn controls the SMT level. That's a poor
> interface on the kernel side (my bad), but we have to live with it
> now. However we could de-couple that KVM id from the core-id. It'd
> no doubt cause some complications with kvm-xics, but we can probably
> handle it.
>
> > I'm suggesting we introduce cc->stable_id to be able to compute a simple
> > stable_cpu_id in the range [0...max_cpus), like x86 and ARM.
>
> I really don't see what properties this is supposed to have that are
> different from the existing core-id.
>
Simplicity of always having CPU0, 1, 2, 3... max_cpus in QEMU, and try
to hide the "poor interface on the kernel side" from the code that
does not need it... but maybe that is not that important.
> >
> > > Instead we should be setting the thread stable ids based on the core
> > > stable id.
> > >
> > > > I think stable_cpu_id is the prerequisite to compute both cpu_dt_id and instance_id.
> > > >
> > > > Makes sense ?
> > > >
> > > > > + if (cs->has_stable_cpu_id) {
> > > > > + cs->stable_cpu_id = cc->core_id + i;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > snprintf(id, sizeof(id), "thread[%d]", i);
> > > > > object_property_add_child(OBJECT(sc), id, obj, &local_err);
> > > > > if (local_err) {
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-08 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 14:50 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] sPAPR: Fix migration when CPUs are removed in random order Bharata B Rao
2016-07-07 14:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] cpu, target-ppc: Move cpu_vmstate_[un]register calls to cpu_common_[un]realize Bharata B Rao
2016-07-07 14:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] cpu: Introduce CPUState::stable_cpu_id Bharata B Rao
2016-07-07 17:52 ` Greg Kurz
2016-07-08 5:21 ` David Gibson
2016-07-08 5:19 ` David Gibson
2016-07-08 11:11 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-07-11 3:22 ` David Gibson
2016-07-11 3:35 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-07-11 7:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-07-11 13:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] VARIANT 1: reuse device compat logic to pick preffered CPU's migration instance_id Igor Mammedov
2016-07-11 13:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] VARIANT 2: use machine specific callback to pick " Igor Mammedov
2016-07-11 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] VARIANT 1: reuse device compat logic to pick preffered " Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-12 5:07 ` David Gibson
2016-07-12 8:11 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-07-13 1:39 ` David Gibson
2016-07-12 7:06 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-07-12 8:21 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-07-12 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] cpu: add migration_id to allow board to provide " Igor Mammedov
2016-07-12 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] pc: fix migration failure after cpu hot-unplung Igor Mammedov
2016-07-11 7:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] cpu: Introduce CPUState::stable_cpu_id Igor Mammedov
2016-07-12 5:09 ` David Gibson
2016-07-07 14:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] spapr: Set stable_cpu_id for threads of CPU cores Bharata B Rao
2016-07-07 16:11 ` Greg Kurz
2016-07-08 5:25 ` David Gibson
2016-07-08 7:46 ` Greg Kurz
2016-07-08 7:59 ` David Gibson
2016-07-08 15:24 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2016-07-11 3:23 ` David Gibson
2016-07-08 5:24 ` David Gibson
2016-07-08 6:41 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-07-08 7:39 ` David Gibson
2016-07-08 10:59 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-07-11 3:12 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-07-11 3:26 ` David Gibson
2016-07-11 8:15 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-07-12 4:41 ` David Gibson
2016-07-07 14:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] xics: Use stable_cpu_id instead of cpu_index in XICS code Bharata B Rao
2016-07-08 5:32 ` David Gibson
2016-07-07 14:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] spapr: Enable the use of stable_cpu_id from pseries-2.7 onwards Bharata B Rao
2016-07-07 16:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] sPAPR: Fix migration when CPUs are removed in random order Greg Kurz
2016-07-08 5:34 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160708172424.0f37f508@bahia.lan \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).