From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMYn9-0004OS-AS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:50:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMYn6-0000iE-6w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:50:23 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:51718 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMYn6-0000i8-1q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:50:20 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u6BAnKJl095266 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:50:19 -0400 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 243euc4cg9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:50:18 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:50:17 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84AC1B08072 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:51:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.216]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u6BAoElx9109980 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:50:14 GMT Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u6BAoC0O028633 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:50:13 -0600 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:50:08 +0200 From: David Hildenbrand In-Reply-To: <20160630093204.7c0c68fe@thinkpad-w530> References: <1466514153-85777-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160630093204.7c0c68fe@thinkpad-w530> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20160711125008.5c5806d0@thinkpad-w530> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/28] s390x CPU models: exposing features List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, imammedo@redhat.com, jdenemar@redhat.com, mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com > Are there any further comments, especially on patches 23-25, introducing new > QOM interfaces? Ping, can somebody please have a look, especially on patches 23-25? We really want to know if we can proceed with this CPU model approach. David > > Also, if anybody is planning to look into this, please speak up :) > > Otherwise it might make sense to put this onto the next KVM call agenda. > > David