From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57134)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1bUpfe-0001zF-TF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:28:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1bUpfd-0005Nz-1w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:28:49 -0400
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:28:37 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160803062837.GB11235@ad.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <1470147137-21970-1-git-send-email-clord@redhat.com>
	<1c794ef7-3c5a-a95c-7158-1cd1f0773f23@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1c794ef7-3c5a-a95c-7158-1cd1f0773f23@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/4] Dynamic module loading for block
 drivers
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Colin Lord <clord@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com

On Tue, 08/02 10:17, Colin Lord wrote:
> It sounds like since this series removes dmg from the list of
> modularized drivers, there is a libbz2 dependency that may get pulled in
> from the dmg driver. I believe Fam was suggesting moving that part of
> the dmg driver into its own module (although not modularizing the entire
> dmg driver). Does that sound like a correct interpretation Fam? I do

Yes.

> like the idea, but I'm a little hesitant to put that into this series
> because I'd like to keep this series fairly simple so that hopefully
> there doesn't need to be too much more discussion about it. My
> internship will be ending soon so I'd prefer this series be finished
> sooner rather than later. Also I don't think anything in this series
> excludes this idea from being added later if we want. Of course there is
> always room for discussion, so if there are other thoughts I'm happy to
> listen.

I'll prepare a patch that can be applied before this series so that we don't
regress on dmg library.

Fam