From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWgWw-0000EP-7h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 05:07:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWgWu-0008Q7-ED for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 05:07:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 11:07:18 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20160808090718.GB4401@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <1470229005-152704-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1470229005-152704-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] fix [mirror: double performance...] List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, den@openvz.org Am 03.08.2016 um 14:56 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > Hi all. > > Here are some fixes related to my > [mirror: double performance of the bulk stage if the disc is full] > > As Kevin noted, iotest 109 is broken after [mirror: double perf..]. > I'm sorry about it, 0002 fixes this test. > 0001 is just related improvement and is not necessary. Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin