From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bX9Es-0004P8-VO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:46:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bX9Eo-00011y-3J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:46:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bX9En-00011Y-UE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:46:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:46:35 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20160809154635.GD2025@work-vm> References: <1470702146-24399-1-git-send-email-liang.z.li@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1470702146-24399-1-git-send-email-liang.z.li@intel.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: fix live migration failure with compression List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Liang Li Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com * Liang Li (liang.z.li@intel.com) wrote: > Because of commit 11808bb0c422, which remove some condition checks > of 'f->ops->writev_buffer', 'qemu_put_qemu_file' should be enhanced > to clear the 'f_src->iovcnt', or 'f_src->iovcnt' may exceed the > MAX_IOV_SIZE which will break live migration. This should be fixed. > > Signed-off-by: Liang Li > Reported-by: Jinshi Zhang > --- > migration/qemu-file.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/migration/qemu-file.c b/migration/qemu-file.c > index bbc565e..e9fae31 100644 > --- a/migration/qemu-file.c > +++ b/migration/qemu-file.c > @@ -668,6 +668,7 @@ int qemu_put_qemu_file(QEMUFile *f_des, QEMUFile *f_src) > len = f_src->buf_index; > qemu_put_buffer(f_des, f_src->buf, f_src->buf_index); > f_src->buf_index = 0; > + f_src->iovcnt = 0; > } If you're just using the buf[] in the src, how does it end up incrementing the iovcnt? Dave > return len; > } > -- > 1.9.1 > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK