From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54314) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbqki-0000hp-7H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:03:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbqkd-0003BG-UD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:03:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbqkd-0003B8-Ox for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:02:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:02:55 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20160822175343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1470892391-4917-1-git-send-email-ppandit@redhat.com> <20160819183717.4de8c99d@bahia.lan> <20160819193042.215616b5@bahia.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] 9pfs: add check for relative path List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Greg Kurz , P J P , Qemu Developers , Prasad J Pandit , Felix Wilhelm , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 19 August 2016 at 18:30, Greg Kurz wrote: > > Maybe the check can even be made in the top layer then. I should spend > > more time to see which is best. > > > > My main concern now is that, unlike I said on IRC, I'm afraid I won't be > > able to work on this before next Wednesday... :-\ > > > > Hope it is not too late for 2.7... > > Opinions welcome on whether we need to hold 2.7 for this bug. > > thanks > -- PMM Not really sure, but balloon migration seems borken too, and I'm trying to fix it up. -- MST