From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposed release timetable for 2.8
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:08:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160901140823.GA24262@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9J6Yxqqeg+BzEjNJfuX1Zr93i3797J+3QD-HXHMANUew@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1539 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:18:10PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> I know 2.7 isn't quite out the door yet, but I figured we should
> kick off the discussion of 2.8's schedule. At the QEMU Summit there
> was some discussion on how we're doing with releases, and I think
> the consensus view was that we should try to cut down the softfreeze
> period and also be stricter about (a) making sure pull requests get
> in in a timely way before rc0 and (b) we don't take new features
> during softfreeze.
>
> (I'm not entirely sure I have those right, and in any case they're
> not pre-decided conclusions, so corrections and further opinion
> welcome.)
>
> As a strawman, here's a timetable which results in a final
> release in December at the usual sort of time (ie allowing for
> the usual slippage without it hitting the holiday season):
>
>
> 2016-10-25 softfreeze, if you think we need 3 weeks, or:
> 2016-11-01 if you think we can do a 2 week softfreeze
> 2016-11-08 deadline for getting pull requests on list before hardfreeze?
> 2016-11-15 rc0 (start of hardfreeze)
> 2016-11-22 rc1
> 2016-11-29 rc2
> 2016-12-06 rc3
> 2016-12-13 final v2.8.0
I suggest we do the schedule above with a firm hardfreeze deadline where
no more feature pull requests are allowed. This means a 2 week
softfreeze and time before -rc0 for the maintainer to merge and test
pull requests:
2016-10-25 softfreeze
2016-11-08 hardfreeze
2016-11-15 rc0
2016-11-22 rc1
2016-11-29 rc2
2016-12-06 rc3
2016-12-13 final v2.8.0
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-01 11:18 [Qemu-devel] proposed release timetable for 2.8 Peter Maydell
2016-09-01 14:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2016-09-05 9:38 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-09-05 18:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-09-05 14:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-05 15:11 ` Peter Maydell
2016-09-05 15:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-14 14:27 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-09-06 2:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-09-06 7:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-05 11:10 ` Peter Maydell
2016-09-05 12:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-09-06 10:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-09-06 10:40 ` Peter Maydell
2016-09-06 12:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-09-06 12:43 ` Peter Maydell
2016-09-05 12:34 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160901140823.GA24262@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).