From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34488)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1bh5dN-0002LZ-KD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 21:57:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1bh5dM-0006Ns-RB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 21:57:09 -0400
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:49:50 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160906014950.GD653@al.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <1470662013-19785-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1470662013-19785-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/20] block: Image locking series for
 2.8
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>, rjones@redhat.com, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

On Mon, 08/08 21:13, Fam Zheng wrote:
> v7: - Rebase.
>     - Address comments from Kevin and Max.
>     - Option rename: "exclusive" -> "auto". [Kevin]
>     - Option placement: "root BDS" -> "node".
>       It's still a bit controversy where the option should go, but so far it
>       seems per node is the safest.
>     - Assert in bdrv_open_common that lock flags don't conflict. [Kevin]
>     - Skip qemu_dup patches as they are already merged.
>     - Fix a wrong assertion in raw_reopen_to_unlock.
>     - Put "static int" to the same line in raw-posix.c. [Kevin]
>     - Remove superfluous blank lines.
>     - Add comment in raw posix's sophisticated reopen code. [Kevin]
>     - .bdrv_lockf is kept on the contrary to separate .bdrv_lock and
>       .bdrv_unlock, because having the BdrvLockfCmd in the interface makes
>       implementing the reopen logic as is done in this series much easier.
>     - Drop the unnecessary mirror target locking patch. [Max]
>     - Add a patch to let 130 work with image locking.

Ping?