qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Cc: famz@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
	mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	yjs-kernel@cmss.chinamobile.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] aio: improve aio_poll performance by checking epoll only once
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:40:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160914164017.GR16438@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473851019-7005-3-git-send-email-baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:03:39AM -0400, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> As epoll whether enabled or not is a global setting, we can just
> check it only once rather than checking it with every node iteration.
> Through this we can avoid a lot of checks when epoll is not enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <lixiubo@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
>  aio-posix.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

The commit message says "improve aio_poll performance" but no benchmark
results were provided.  Therefore I can't take this patch as a
performance optimization.  I'm still happy to merge the patch since it
makes the if statement simpler but I'll rename it to "aio-posix: avoid
unnecessary aio_epoll_enabled() calls".

I don't think this patch gives a measurable performance improvement.  If
you believe otherwise, please post benchmark results.  Please let me
know what you think.

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-14 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-14 11:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] improve aio_poll performance Yaowei Bai
2016-09-14 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: mirror: fix wrong comment of mirror_start Yaowei Bai
2016-09-14 17:04   ` Eric Blake
2016-09-14 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] aio: improve aio_poll performance by checking epoll only once Yaowei Bai
2016-09-14 16:40   ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2016-09-18  1:32     ` Yaowei Bai
2016-09-19 15:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] improve aio_poll performance Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160914164017.GR16438@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=yjs-kernel@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).