From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkWNU-0001wS-R8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:07:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkWNP-0006SQ-O4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:06:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:06:37 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20160915130637.GH4726@noname.redhat.com> References: <226771a1872ae391859397e45c960eaba63d2bd0.1473867967.git.berto@igalia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <226771a1872ae391859397e45c960eaba63d2bd0.1473867967.git.berto@igalia.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] commit: Add 'base' to the reopen queue before 'overlay_bs' List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alberto Garcia Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Am 14.09.2016 um 17:52 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben: > Now that we're checking for duplicates in the reopen queue, there's no > need to force a specific order in which the queue is constructed so we > can revert 3db2bd5508c86a1605258bc77c9672d93b5c350e. > > Since both ways of constructing the queue are now valid, this patch > doesn't have any effect on the behavior of QEMU and is not strictly > necessary. However it can help us check that the fix for the reopen > queue is robust: if it stops working properly at some point, iotest > 040 will break. > > Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf