From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bm2UI-0007ee-KZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:36:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bm2Id-0006XY-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:24:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bm2Ic-0006XE-US for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:24:11 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BA0808FF for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:24:07 +0100 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20160919172407.GY15201@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" References: <1474296549-29171-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <1474296549-29171-4-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <87lgynakph.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lgynakph.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/18] trace: remove some now unused functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:00:26PM +0200, Llu=C3=ADs Vilanova wrote: > Daniel P Berrange writes: >=20 > > The trace_event_count, trace_event_id and > > trace_event_pattern methods are no longer required > > now that everything is using the iterator APIs >=20 > > The trace_event_set_state and trace_event_set_vcpu_state > > macros were also unused. >=20 > Wouldn't it make more sense to fold the removal of trace_event_pattern(= ) into > the previous patch? No - that would be mixing two changes in one commit. There are two logically separate changes here - one is changing an internal implementation detail, and one is altering the public API to remove methods. Regards, Daniel --=20 |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange= / :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.or= g :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr= / :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vn= c :|