From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49611)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <voipio@kos.to>) id 1bmn1o-00011L-IN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:17:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <voipio@kos.to>) id 1bmn1k-00061Y-9A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:17:56 -0400
Received: from jessie.kos.to ([212.47.231.226]:43926 helo=pilvi.kos.to)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <voipio@kos.to>) id 1bmn1k-0005zg-3q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:17:52 -0400
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:17:44 +0000
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20160921191744.GE24113@kos.to>
References: <20160909183558.28384-1-T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk>
	<CAFEAcA9c4r4mGdGw60Avx7AeN_U5fgje4MxsVn=tVsgH-WDVyg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9c4r4mGdGw60Avx7AeN_U5fgje4MxsVn=tVsgH-WDVyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Fix incorrect offset of
 tuc_stack in ARM do_sigframe_return_v2
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Timothy E Baldwin <T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:02:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 September 2016 at 19:35, Timothy E Baldwin
> <T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
> > struct target_ucontext_v2 is not at the begining of the signal frame,
> > therefore do_sigaltstack was being passed bogus arguments.
> >
> > As the offset depends on the type of signal frame fixed by passing in the
> > beginning of the context from do_sigreturn_v2 and do_rt_sigreturn_v2.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Timothy Edward Baldwin <T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk>
> > ---
> 
> Thanks for the respin.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Applied to linux-user que, thanks!