From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
vkaplans@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
dgibson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 1/3] memory: introduce IOMMUNotifier and its caps
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:17:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922071746.GP5134@pxdev.xzpeter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160922052048.GF2085@umbus.fritz.box>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:20:48PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:58:54PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > IOMMU Notifier list is used for notifying IO address mapping changes.
> > Currently VFIO is the only user.
> >
> > However it is possible that future consumer like vhost would like to
> > only listen to part of its notifications (e.g., cache invalidations).
> >
> > This patch introduced IOMMUNotifier and IOMMUNotfierFlag bits for a
> > finer grained control of it.
> >
> > IOMMUNotifier contains a bitfield for the notify consumer describing
> > what kind of notification it is interested in. Currently two kinds of
> > notifications are defined:
> >
> > - IOMMU_NOTIFIER_MAP: for newly mapped entries (additions)
> > - IOMMU_NOTIFIER_UNMAP: for entries to be removed (cache invalidates)
> >
> > When registering the IOMMU notifier, we need to specify one or multiple
> > types of messages to listen to.
> >
> > When notifications are triggered, its type will be checked against the
> > notifier's type bits, and only notifiers with registered bits will be
> > notified.
> >
> > (For any IOMMU implementation, an in-place mapping change should be
> > notified with an UNMAP followed by a MAP.)
>
> Ok, I wasn't clear. I meant a big fat comment in the *code*, not just
> in the commit message. It should not be necessary to look at the
> commit history to figure out how to use an interface correctly
>
> Even a comment in the code is barely adequate, compared to designing
> the interface signatures such that it's obvious.
>
> Please bear in mind:
> http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-03-30.html
> and http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-04-01.html
>
Thanks for the links.
Maybe a better solution is to re-design the IOTLB interface. However
that's out of the scope of this series, and another patchset can be
opened for the refactoring work IMHO if there is a strong willingness.
For now I can add this into comments:
---------8<-----------
@@ -607,6 +628,15 @@ uint64_t memory_region_iommu_get_min_page_size(MemoryRegion *mr);
/**
* memory_region_notify_iommu: notify a change in an IOMMU translation entry.
*
+ * The notification type will be decided by entry.perm bits:
+ *
+ * - For UNMAP (cache invalidation) notifies: set entry.perm to IOMMU_NONE.
+ * - For MAP (newly added entry) notifies: set entry.perm to the
+ * permission of the page (which is definitely !IOMMU_NONE).
+ *
+ * Note: for any IOMMU implementation, an in-place mapping change
+ * should be notified with an UNMAP followed by a MAP.
+ *
* @mr: the memory region that was changed
* @entry: the new entry in the IOMMU translation table. The entry
* replaces all old entries for the same virtual I/O address range.
--------->8-----------
[...]
> > -static void vfio_iommu_map_notify(Notifier *n, void *data)
> > +static void vfio_iommu_map_notify(IOMMUNotifier *n, IOMMUTLBEntry *data)
>
> This change leaves a now pointless IOMMUTLBEntry *iotlb = data a few
> lines below.
Yes, will fix.
>
> > {
> > VFIOGuestIOMMU *giommu = container_of(n, VFIOGuestIOMMU, n);
> > VFIOContainer *container = giommu->container;
> > @@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> > section->offset_within_region;
> > giommu->container = container;
> > giommu->n.notify = vfio_iommu_map_notify;
> > + giommu->n.notifier_flags = IOMMU_NOTIFIER_ALL;
> > QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&container->giommu_list, giommu, giommu_next);
> >
> > memory_region_register_iommu_notifier(giommu->iommu, &giommu->n);
> > diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
> > index 3e4d416..a3ec7aa 100644
> > --- a/include/exec/memory.h
> > +++ b/include/exec/memory.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,27 @@ struct IOMMUTLBEntry {
> > IOMMUAccessFlags perm;
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Bitmap for differnet IOMMUNotifier capabilities. Each notifier can
>
> s/differnet/different/
Will fix. Thanks.
-- peterx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-22 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-21 4:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/3] Introduce IOMMUNotifier struct Peter Xu
2016-09-21 4:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 1/3] memory: introduce IOMMUNotifier and its caps Peter Xu
2016-09-22 5:20 ` David Gibson
2016-09-22 7:17 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2016-09-23 0:36 ` David Gibson
2016-09-21 4:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 2/3] memory: introduce IOMMUOps.notify_flag_changed Peter Xu
2016-09-21 4:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/3] intel_iommu: allow UNMAP notifiers Peter Xu
2016-09-22 5:24 ` David Gibson
2016-09-22 5:55 ` Peter Xu
2016-09-22 7:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-23 0:35 ` David Gibson
2016-09-23 0:35 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160922071746.GP5134@pxdev.xzpeter.org \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vkaplans@redhat.com \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).