From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:58:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160923075807.GH8832@lemon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe269ed3-bc06-9dcd-c987-54555189f9bb@redhat.com>
On Wed, 09/21 14:24, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2016 05:19 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Previously all test cases in a category, such as check-qtest-y, are
> > executed in a single long gtester command. This patch separates each
> > test into its own make target to allow better parallism.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This saves 50% of the time "make check takes" compared to on master
> > (I use -j8). RFC because I'm not sure if the new gcov usage is correct
> > with the now much higher level of parallism compared to before.
> > ---
> > tests/Makefile.include | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include
> > index 14be491..9bf0326 100644
> > --- a/tests/Makefile.include
> > +++ b/tests/Makefile.include
> > @@ -691,27 +691,29 @@ GCOV_OPTIONS = -n $(if $(V),-f,)
> > # gtester tests, possibly with verbose output
> >
> > .PHONY: $(patsubst %, check-qtest-%, $(QTEST_TARGETS))
> > -$(patsubst %, check-qtest-%, $(QTEST_TARGETS)): check-qtest-%: $(check-qtest-y)
> > +
> > +qtest-run-%: tests/%
> > $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@rm -f *.gcda */*.gcda */*/*.gcda */*/*/*.gcda,)
> > - $(call quiet-command,QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=$*-softmmu/qemu-system-$* \
> > + $(call quiet-command,\
> > + $(if $(QTEST_TARGET), \
> > + QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=$(QTEST_TARGET)-softmmu/qemu-system-$(QTEST_TARGET)) \
> > QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img$(EXESUF) \
> > MALLOC_PERTURB_=$${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$$((RANDOM % 255 + 1))} \
> > - gtester $(GTESTER_OPTIONS) -m=$(SPEED) $(check-qtest-$*-y) $(check-qtest-generic-y),"GTESTER $@")
> > - $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@for f in $(gcov-files-$*-y) $(gcov-files-generic-y); do \
> > - echo Gcov report for $$f:;\
> > - $(GCOV) $(GCOV_OPTIONS) $$f -o `dirname $$f`; \
> > - done,)
> > + gtester $< $(GTESTER_OPTIONS) -m=$(SPEED),"GTESTER $<")
> > + $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV), @echo Gcov report for $<:;\
> > + $(GCOV) $(GCOV_OPTIONS) $< -o `dirname $<`; \
> > + )
> > +
> > +$(foreach target, $(QTEST_TARGETS), \
> > + $(eval check-qtest-$(target): QTEST_TARGET := $(target)) \
> > + $(eval check-qtest-$(target): $(patsubst tests/%, qtest-run-%, \
> > + $(check-qtest-y) \
> > + $(check-qtest-$(target)-y) \
> > + $(check-qtest-generic-y))) \
> > +)
> >
> > .PHONY: $(patsubst %, check-%, $(check-unit-y))
> > -$(patsubst %, check-%, $(check-unit-y)): check-%: %
> > - $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@rm -f *.gcda */*.gcda */*/*.gcda */*/*/*.gcda,)
> > - $(call quiet-command, \
> > - MALLOC_PERTURB_=$${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$$((RANDOM % 255 + 1))} \
> > - gtester $(GTESTER_OPTIONS) -m=$(SPEED) $*,"GTESTER $*")
> > - $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@for f in $(gcov-files-$(subst tests/,,$*)-y) $(gcov-files-generic-y); do \
> > - echo Gcov report for $$f:;\
> > - $(GCOV) $(GCOV_OPTIONS) $$f -o `dirname $$f`; \
> > - done,)
> > +$(patsubst %, check-%, $(check-unit-y)): check-tests/%: qtest-run-%
> >
> > # gtester tests with XML output
> >
> >
>
> I can't vouch for gcov either, but:
Too bad that this seems to be too big a hammer that breaks the way gcov was
used: 1) the "rm *.gcda" command now runs in each test, so it's harder to
get an overall coverage report; 2) there is a risk that the parallism may
corrupt those files. :(
Fam
>
> Tested-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>
> -j1:
>
> real 1m51.195s
> user 1m5.478s
> sys 0m21.158s
>
> -j9:
>
> real 0m53.039s
> user 1m41.754s
> sys 0m31.150s
>
>
> This seems useful.
>
> --js
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-23 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-12 9:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel Fam Zheng
2016-09-21 18:24 ` John Snow
2016-09-23 7:58 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2016-09-23 9:39 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2016-09-23 9:59 ` Fam Zheng
2016-09-24 2:37 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2016-09-27 10:14 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-28 1:31 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2016-09-28 1:45 ` Fam Zheng
2016-09-28 1:54 ` Gonglei (Arei)
2016-09-28 2:10 ` Fam Zheng
2016-09-27 10:17 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-27 10:58 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160923075807.GH8832@lemon \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).