From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnNGE-0007uZ-Fc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:59:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnNG9-0004ep-EE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:59:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnNG9-0004ej-81 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 05:59:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:59:05 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160923095905.GJ8832@lemon> References: <1470993574-11906-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <20160923075807.GH8832@lemon> <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF19020B03D674C@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF19020B03D674C@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Gonglei (Arei)" Cc: John Snow , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Fri, 09/23 09:39, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: > > Hi Fam, > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Qemu-devel > > [mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+arei.gonglei=huawei.com@nongnu.org] On > > Behalf Of Fam Zheng > > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 3:58 PM > > To: John Snow > > Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org > > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel > > > > On Wed, 09/21 14:24, John Snow wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 08/12/2016 05:19 AM, Fam Zheng wrote: > > > > Previously all test cases in a category, such as check-qtest-y, are > > > > executed in a single long gtester command. This patch separates each > > > > test into its own make target to allow better parallism. > > > > > > That's will be great if we can specify a test to run, especially for the scenario > which add one use qtest case. > > For example: > > # make check test-crypto-cipher > > then only run the tests/ test-crypto-cipher. > > Do you think it makes sense? Or more likely: # make check TESTS="test-crypto-cipher test-crypto-hash ..." Usually I just extract the gtester command line with V=1 and run it from my shell prompt. Feel free to send a patch, though. Fam