From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37817)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <voipio@kos.to>) id 1bnjq1-0000Hf-VL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:05:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <voipio@kos.to>) id 1bnjpx-00005v-Cb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:05:40 -0400
Received: from jessie.kos.to ([212.47.231.226]:37748 helo=pilvi.kos.to)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <voipio@kos.to>) id 1bnjpw-0008Qj-QZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:05:36 -0400
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:05:28 +0000
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20160924100528.GA11666@kos.to>
References: <20160919114456.66629-1-aleksandar.markovic@rt-rk.com>
	<20160921131654.GA18256@hhmipssw201.hh.imgtec.org>
	<20160921191220.GD24113@kos.to>
	<20160922062435.GA21330@hhmipssw201.hh.imgtec.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160922062435.GA21330@hhmipssw201.hh.imgtec.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/7] linux-user: Fix miscellaneous
 Mips-specific issues
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Leon Alrae <leon.alrae@imgtec.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@rt-rk.com>, miodrag.dinic@imgtec.com, aleksandar.rikalo@imgtec.com, aleksandar.markovic@imgtec.com

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:24:36AM +0100, Leon Alrae wrote:
> > > Applied to target-mips queue, thanks.
 
> > That's a bit unorthodox way but you have my acked-by then..
 
> Since these are mips-specific fixes I assumed it doesn't really matter
> whether it goes via your or my tree (I picked up a few patches like
> this in the past). Anyway, thanks for ack and next time I'll check with you.

The main risk here is that the patches conflict with other patches in
linux-user/ directory, creating potential for merge conflict. Which
unfortunately might be the case right now, as the main linux-user patchset
was already merged..

Riku