qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: "Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] intc/i8259: implement InterruptStatsProvider interface
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:29:08 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160928072908.GH18880@umbus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a051808-2982-4431-b312-f460b4566703@reactos.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4073 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 07:22:01AM +0200, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
> Le 28/09/2016 à 03:37, David Gibson a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:49:47PM +0200, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
> > > Le 27/09/2016 à 06:11, David Gibson a écrit :
> > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:23:24PM +0200, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpoussin@reactos.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  hw/intc/i8259.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/intc/i8259.c b/hw/intc/i8259.c
> > > > > index c2607a5..75c8d22 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/intc/i8259.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/intc/i8259.c
> > > > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> > > > >  #include "qemu/timer.h"
> > > > >  #include "qemu/log.h"
> > > > >  #include "hw/isa/i8259_internal.h"
> > > > > +#include "hw/intc/intc.h"
> > > > > 
> > > > >  /* debug PIC */
> > > > >  //#define DEBUG_PIC
> > > > > @@ -251,6 +252,35 @@ static void pic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> > > > >      pic_init_reset(s);
> > > > >  }
> > > > > 
> > > > > +static bool pic_get_statistics(InterruptStatsProvider *obj,
> > > > > +                               uint64_t **irq_counts, unsigned int *nb_irqs)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +    PICCommonState *s = PIC_COMMON(obj);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    if (s->master) {
> > > > > +#ifdef DEBUG_IRQ_COUNT
> > > > > +        *irq_counts = irq_count;
> > > > 
> > > > So, the irq_counts return parameter is set to point at an internal
> > > > structure of the intc, in this and the other implementations.
> > > > 
> > > > Is that safe, without some contract about how long the array pointer
> > > > is valid and/or correct?  Could it be a problem if in future we tried
> > > > to implement this for an intc that doesn't keep irq stats as a simple
> > > > array (e.g. kept the count in a structure also containing other
> > > > information for each irq)?
> > > 
> > > I implemented the interface with more than 15 interrupt controllers in hw/intc.
> > > It worked well for all of them. In fact, most of the times, the device is doing something like:
> > 
> > Ok, that's a pretty strong argument.
> > 
> > > my_device_irq_handler(int n)
> > > {
> > >   MyDeviceState *s = ...;
> > >   qemu_irq_raise(s->master_irq);
> > > }
> > > 
> > > realize()
> > > {
> > >   qemu_allocate_irqs(my_device_irq_handler, NB_IRQS)
> > > }
> > > 
> > > It's quite easy to add in MyDeviceState:
> > >   uint64_t irq_count[NB_IRQS] in MyDeviceState;
> > > and adding in my_device_irq_handler
> > >   s->irq_count[n]++;
> > > 
> > > We can maybe add a note on the interface that:
> > > - the pointer must remain valid for the whole life of the device,
> > > - the contents may stale, but must not be invalid
> > > 
> > > For your intc, you'll need to have a second array irq_count, which is updated on each
> > > get_statistics() call.
> > > 
> > > > I'm wondering if a safer interface might be to actually copy out a
> > > > snapshot of the counts, which the caller is responsible for freeing.
> > > 
> > > In that case, all implementations will have to do g_malloc + memcpy, and caller will have to call g_free.
> > > That's possible, but IMO less easy to implement on device side.
> > 
> > True.
> > 
> > I still feel a bit uneasy without having some sort of description of
> > the length of validity of the pointer.  With the current
> > implementation and use cases, it seems like "until the BQL is next
> > dropped" would be about right.  Does that seem like it's correct to you?
> 
> Yes, it seems correct.
> I can add in interface header that:
> "Returned pointer and statistics must remain valid until the BQL is
> next dropped"

Ok, makes sense.

> Does it require a v3?

Not for my sake.

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-28  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-26 20:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] intc: change 'info irq' and 'info pic' to be target-agnostic Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-26 20:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/6] intc: add an interface to gather statistics/informations on interrupt controllers Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-26 20:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] intc/i8259: implement InterruptStatsProvider interface Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-27  4:11   ` David Gibson
2016-09-27 18:49     ` Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-28  1:37       ` David Gibson
2016-09-28  5:22         ` Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-28  7:29           ` David Gibson [this message]
2016-09-26 20:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/6] intc/slavio_intctl: " Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-27 14:53   ` Artyom Tarasenko
2016-09-27 18:39     ` Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-28  8:35       ` Artyom Tarasenko
2016-09-26 20:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/6] intc/lm32_pic: " Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-26 20:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] intc: make HMP 'info irq' and 'info pic' commands use " Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-30 11:23   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-26 20:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] intc: make HMP 'info irq' and 'info pic' commands available on all targets Hervé Poussineau
2016-09-27  4:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] intc: change 'info irq' and 'info pic' to be target-agnostic David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160928072908.GH18880@umbus \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=hpoussin@reactos.org \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).