From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>
Cc: Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] io: Fix double shift usages on QIOChannel features
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:21:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160928092105.GH21583@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <256D7E5B-CA2E-4338-B407-FB1333D9007F@nutanix.com>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 06:35:41PM +0000, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> > On 27 Sep 2016, at 18:23, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:49:18AM -0700, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>
> >> ---
> >> io/channel-socket.c | 11 ++++++-----
> >> io/channel-tls.c | 4 ++--
> >> io/channel-websock.c | 4 ++--
> >> io/channel.c | 10 ++++------
> >> migration/qemu-file-channel.c | 3 +--
> >> qemu-char.c | 3 +--
> >> 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > The test/test-io-channel-*.c unit tests should be updated to
> > validate the correct handling.
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Actually it looks like all tests are using the has_feature() wrapper
> already, so I'm not sure I need to fix anything here. Please let me
> know if I missed something.
If we had full test coverage of the feature flags, then we should have
seen a test failure for this bug. So there must be something we're
not exercising in the test suite.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 16:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] io: Fix double shift usages on QIOChannel features Felipe Franciosi
2016-09-27 16:53 ` no-reply
2016-09-27 17:12 ` Marc-André Lureau
2016-09-28 10:55 ` Felipe Franciosi
2016-09-28 10:58 ` Marc-André Lureau
2016-09-28 11:06 ` Marc-André Lureau
2016-09-28 11:00 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-27 17:23 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-27 17:57 ` Felipe Franciosi
2016-09-27 18:04 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-27 18:16 ` Felipe Franciosi
2016-09-27 18:35 ` Felipe Franciosi
2016-09-28 9:21 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160928092105.GH21583@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).