From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Ashish Mittal <ashmit602@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
armbru@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com,
famz@redhat.com, ashish.mittal@veritas.com,
Ketan.Nilangekar@veritas.com, Abhijit.Dey@veritas.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 RFC] block/vxhs: Initial commit to add Veritas HyperScale VxHS block device support
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:13:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160928111332.GD4196@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475035789-685-1-git-send-email-ashish.mittal@veritas.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4749 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:09:49PM -0700, Ashish Mittal wrote:
> +vxhs_bdrv_init(const char c) "Registering VxHS AIO driver%c"
Why do several trace events have a %c format specifier at the end and it
always takes a '.' value?
> +#define QNIO_CONNECT_TIMOUT_SECS 120
This isn't used and there is a typo (s/TIMOUT/TIMEOUT/). Can it be
dropped?
> +static int32_t
> +vxhs_qnio_iio_ioctl(void *apictx, uint32_t rfd, uint32_t opcode, int64_t *in,
> + void *ctx, uint32_t flags)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + switch (opcode) {
> + case VDISK_STAT:
It seems unnecessary to abstract the iio_ioctl() constants and then have
a switch statement to translate to the actual library constants. It
makes little sense since the flags argument already uses the library
constants. Just use the library's constants.
> + ret = iio_ioctl(apictx, rfd, IOR_VDISK_STAT,
> + in, ctx, flags);
> + break;
> +
> + case VDISK_AIO_FLUSH:
> + ret = iio_ioctl(apictx, rfd, IOR_VDISK_FLUSH,
> + in, ctx, flags);
> + break;
> +
> + case VDISK_CHECK_IO_FAILOVER_READY:
> + ret = iio_ioctl(apictx, rfd, IOR_VDISK_CHECK_IO_FAILOVER_READY,
> + in, ctx, flags);
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + ret = -ENOTSUP;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + *in = 0;
Some callers pass in = NULL so this will crash.
The naming seems wrong: this is an output argument, not an input
argument. Please call it "out_val" or similar.
> + res = vxhs_reopen_vdisk(s, s->vdisk_ask_failover_idx);
> + if (res == 0) {
> + res = vxhs_qnio_iio_ioctl(s->qnio_ctx,
> + s->vdisk_hostinfo[s->vdisk_ask_failover_idx].vdisk_rfd,
> + VDISK_CHECK_IO_FAILOVER_READY, NULL, s, flags);
Looking at iio_ioctl(), I'm not sure how this can ever work. The fourth
argument is NULL and iio_ioctl() will attempt *vdisk_size = 0 so this
will crash.
Do you have tests that exercise this code path?
> +/*
> + * This is called by QEMU when a flush gets triggered from within
> + * a guest at the block layer, either for IDE or SCSI disks.
> + */
> +static int vxhs_co_flush(BlockDriverState *bs)
This is called from coroutine context, please add the coroutine_fn
function attribute to document this.
> +{
> + BDRVVXHSState *s = bs->opaque;
> + int64_t size = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * VDISK_AIO_FLUSH ioctl is a no-op at present and will
> + * always return success. This could change in the future.
> + */
> + ret = vxhs_qnio_iio_ioctl(s->qnio_ctx,
> + s->vdisk_hostinfo[s->vdisk_cur_host_idx].vdisk_rfd,
> + VDISK_AIO_FLUSH, &size, NULL, IIO_FLAG_SYNC);
This function is not allowed to block. It cannot do a synchronous
flush. This line is misleading because the constant is called
VDISK_AIO_FLUSH, but looking at the library code I see it's actually a
synchronous call that ends up in a loop that sleeps (!) waiting for the
response.
Please do an async flush and qemu_coroutine_yield() to return
control to QEMU's event loop. When the flush completes you can
qemu_coroutine_enter() again to return from this function.
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + trace_vxhs_co_flush(s->vdisk_guid, ret, errno);
> + vxhs_close(bs);
This looks unsafe. Won't it cause double close() calls for s->fds[]
when bdrv_close() is called later?
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long vxhs_get_vdisk_stat(BDRVVXHSState *s)
sizeof(unsigned long) = 4 on some machines, please change it to int64_t.
I also suggest changing the function name to vxhs_get_vdisk_size() since
it only provides the size.
> +static int64_t vxhs_get_allocated_blocks(BlockDriverState *bs)
> +{
> + BDRVVXHSState *s = bs->opaque;
> + int64_t vdisk_size = 0;
> +
> + if (s->vdisk_size > 0) {
> + vdisk_size = s->vdisk_size;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * TODO:
> + * Once HyperScale storage-virtualizer provides
> + * actual physical allocation of blocks then
> + * fetch that information and return back to the
> + * caller but for now just get the full size.
> + */
> + vdisk_size = vxhs_get_vdisk_stat(s);
> + if (vdisk_size > 0) {
> + s->vdisk_size = vdisk_size;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (vdisk_size > 0) {
> + return vdisk_size; /* return size in bytes */
> + }
> +
> + return -EIO;
> +}
Why are you implementing this function if vxhs doesn't support querying
the allocated file size? Don't return a bogus number. Just don't
implement it like other block drivers.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-28 4:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 RFC] block/vxhs: Initial commit to add Veritas HyperScale VxHS block device support Ashish Mittal
2016-09-28 11:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-28 11:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2016-10-05 4:02 ` Jeff Cody
2016-10-11 7:56 ` ashish mittal
2016-10-18 19:10 ` Jeff Cody
2016-10-19 20:01 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-09-28 11:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-09-28 12:06 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-09-28 21:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-14 15:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-14 18:01 ` ashish mittal
2016-11-15 22:38 ` ashish mittal
2016-11-16 8:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-18 7:26 ` Jeff Cody
2016-11-18 8:57 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-11-18 10:02 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-18 10:57 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-18 11:03 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-11-18 11:36 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-18 11:54 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-11-18 13:25 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-18 13:36 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-11-23 8:25 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-23 22:09 ` ashish mittal
2016-11-23 22:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-24 5:44 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-24 11:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-24 11:31 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-24 16:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-25 8:27 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-25 11:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-28 10:23 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-28 14:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-30 0:45 ` ashish mittal
2016-11-30 4:20 ` Rakesh Ranjan
2016-11-30 8:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-30 9:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-28 7:15 ` Fam Zheng
2016-11-24 10:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2016-11-18 10:34 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-18 14:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-11-18 16:19 ` Jeff Cody
2016-09-29 1:46 ` Jeff Cody
2016-09-29 2:18 ` Jeff Cody
2016-09-29 17:30 ` ashish mittal
2016-09-30 8:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-10-01 3:10 ` ashish mittal
2016-10-03 14:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-10-20 1:31 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-10-24 14:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-25 1:56 ` Abhijit Dey
2016-10-25 5:07 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-10-25 5:15 ` Abhijit Dey
2016-10-25 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-25 21:53 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-10-25 21:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <21994ADD-7BC5-4C77-8D18-C1D4F9A52277@veritas.com>
[not found] ` <ac0aa87f-702d-b53f-a6b7-2257b25a4a2a@redhat.com>
2016-10-26 22:17 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-04 9:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-04 18:44 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-04 9:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-04 18:30 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-07 10:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-07 20:27 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2016-11-08 15:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-11-09 12:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-14 0:06 ashish mittal
2016-12-14 7:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-12-16 1:42 ` Buddhi Madhav
2016-12-16 8:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-02-01 23:59 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2017-02-02 9:53 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-02-02 10:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-02-02 10:15 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-02-02 20:57 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2017-02-02 21:22 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2017-02-03 9:45 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-02-03 21:32 ` Ketan Nilangekar
2017-02-02 20:53 ` Ketan Nilangekar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160928111332.GD4196@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=Abhijit.Dey@veritas.com \
--cc=Ketan.Nilangekar@veritas.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=ashish.mittal@veritas.com \
--cc=ashmit602@gmail.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).