From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/7] intel-iommu: keep buggy EIM enabled in 2.7 machine type
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 18:49:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160929164944.GB12788@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160929150119.GS3877@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
2016-09-29 15:19+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 29/09/2016 13:23, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> QEMU 2.7 allowed EIM even in configurations that were forbidden in the
>> last patch because they were not working, like old KVM or userspace
>> APIC. In order to keep backward compatibility, we again allow guests to
>> misbehave in non-obvious ways, and make it the default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>
> Ugh, I misremembered that VTD_ECAP_EIM was not set in 2.7. :( Perhaps
> it's better to drop this patch...
I think that adding this backward compatibility hack into code that is
supposed to be developed is not a good idea.
2016-09-29 12:01-0300, Eduardo Habkost:
> If you break compatibility and fix it in separate patches, you
> break bisectability (even for people that are bisecting bugs
> unrelated to EIM).
I'd keep it as a separate patch and let maintainers decide whether they
want to squish or drop it.
> (But I still don't understand if patch 6/7 really breaks
> anything, or not.)
Nothing useful.
It "breaks" three cases:
1) If user configured
-machine kernel_irqchip=off -device intel_iommu,intremap=on
QEMU 2.7 pc-q35-2.7 enabled (broken) EIM, but 2.8 wouldn't, leading
to a different machine.
(The same with new KVM and split irqchip.)
2) If user had old KVM and configured
-machine kernel_irqchip=split -device intel_iommu,intremap=on
QEMU 2.7 pc-q35-2.7 enabled (broken) EIM, but after offline migration
to 2.8, QEMU would refuse to start.
3) If user started a pc-q35-2.7 with QEMU 2.8 on a new KVM, then they
could use cluster x2APIC without a problem, but the guest wouldn't
work after offline migration to QEMU 2.7 (I'm not sure if this case
is supported).
Luckily, the intel-iommu device doesn't support live migration. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-29 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-29 11:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] intel_iommu: fix EIM Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/7] apic: add global apic_get_class() Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 14:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-09-29 15:58 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/7] apic: add send_msi() to APICCommonClass Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/7] intel_iommu: pass whole remapped addresses to apic Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] intel-iommu: exit on invalid configuraton earlier Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/7] intel-iommu: add OnOffAuto intr_eim as "eim" property Radim Krčmář
2016-09-30 5:13 ` Peter Xu
2016-09-30 13:50 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] intel_iommu: reject broken EIM Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-29 16:06 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-09-29 16:56 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 16:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-29 15:53 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-09-29 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/7] intel-iommu: keep buggy EIM enabled in 2.7 machine type Radim Krčmář
2016-09-29 13:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-09-29 15:01 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-09-29 16:49 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2016-09-30 5:40 ` Peter Xu
2016-09-30 13:55 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160929164944.GB12788@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).