Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1235 bytes --]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:23:41PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 29.09.2016 um 12:21 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:12:32PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Am 29.09.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> >>> Practically all instances properties should become class properties
> >>> as its going to save wasting memory once most are converted.
> >>
> >> Not all, but most. child<> properties were the reason to have properties
> >> on the instance.
> > 
> > That's why I said "Practically all", instead of just "all" :-)
> 
> To me as non-native speaker "practically" is the opposite of
> "theoretically". :)

Heh, more English corner cases.  "Theoretically" and "in theory" mean
the same thing, but "practically" and "in practice" don't.  Or.. they
do in theory, but not in practice :p.  For bonus confusion, saying
"practically speaking" would, in this context, mean what you expected,
but "practically" on its own doesn't - it means basically the same as
"almost" or "nearly".

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]