From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpuUN-0003Zh-3P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 05:52:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpuUM-000616-1O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 05:52:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:52:05 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20160930095205.GA4567@noname.redhat.com> References: <1475225618-8219-1-git-send-email-wangww.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1475225618-8219-1-git-send-email-wangww.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block: modify top-id's comments List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wang WeiWei Cc: qemu devel , qemu block , Stefan Hajnoczi , Fam Zheng , Max Reitz , Jeff Cody , Paolo Bonzini , John Snow , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , Dong Eddie , Jiang Yunhong , zhanghailiang , Gonglei , Wen Congyang , Changlong Xie This is v2, should be included in the subject line. Am 30.09.2016 um 10:53 hat Wang WeiWei geschrieben: > Kevin Wolf's advice: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-09/msg02391.html > > Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang > Signed-off-by: Changlong Xie > Signed-off-by: Wang WeiWei > Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang > Signed-off-by: Gonglei > --- > qapi/block-core.json | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json > index ada3202..a605107 100644 > --- a/qapi/block-core.json > +++ b/qapi/block-core.json > @@ -2184,7 +2184,8 @@ > # @mode: the replication mode > # > # @top-id: #optional In secondary mode, node name or device ID of the root > -# node who owns the replication node chain. Ignored in primary mode. > +# node who owns the replication node chain. Must not be given in > +# primary mode. > # > # Since: 2.8 > ## As I already wrote for v1: The matching code in block/replication.c is missing to actually error out if the option is given in primary mode. Kevin