From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qtest: add read/write accessors with a specific endianness
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:31:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161006233148.GC18490@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161006161142.1d56f98c@bahia>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2383 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:11:42PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 12:03:34 +0100
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > On 6 October 2016 at 04:38, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 05:31:07AM -0700, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >> On 4 October 2016 at 16:43, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:36:09PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >> >> The difficulty with this patch is that it's hard to tell whether
> > >> >> it's really required, or if this is just adding an extra layer
> > >> >> of byteswapping that should really be done in some other location
> > >> >
> > >> > Actually, it's neither. It's not essential for anything, but it
> > >> > *removes* an extra layer of byteswapping that really never should have
> > >> > been done in the first place.
> > >>
> > >> The patch is very clearly adding calls to swapping functions.
> > >> It looks like it's mostly convenience functions for not doing
> > >> those swaps explicitly in the test cases.
> > >
> > > It's adding 1 swap on top of the memread/memwrite path - that's the
> > > path which had no existing swaps (intended primarily for bag-o'-bytes
> > > block access AFAICT).
> >
> > Yeah, I hadn't noticed it was using the memread/memwrite path.
> > I disagree with using that code path for what ought to be
> > register read/writes (among other things, it's not clear to me
> > that it guarantees that a 4-byte access by the test code is
> > always a 4-byte access on the device, etc).
> >
>
> FWIW, Cedric had another proposal which apparently went unnoticed:
>
> <fc24ad74-da26-a713-9312-a2c2d07fb6a7@kaod.org>
>
> The idea is to add an optional endianness argument to the read*/write*
> commands in the qtest protocol:
> - libqtest then provides explicit _le and _be APIs
> - no extra byteswap is performed on the test program side: qtest
> actually handles that and does exactly 1 or 0 byteswap.
> - it does not use memread/memwrite
> - the current 'guest native' API where qtest tswaps is preserved
That would also be fine by me.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-07 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-04 12:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qtest: add read/write accessors with a specific endianness Cédric Le Goater
2016-10-04 12:36 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-04 14:04 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-10-04 14:07 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-10-04 17:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-04 23:43 ` David Gibson
2016-10-05 5:59 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-10-05 12:31 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-05 13:49 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-10-05 13:53 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-05 14:00 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-10-05 14:20 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-05 17:17 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-10-05 17:32 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-06 3:45 ` David Gibson
2016-10-06 7:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-06 8:37 ` David Gibson
2016-10-06 9:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-06 10:44 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-10-06 10:47 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-06 23:09 ` David Gibson
2016-10-06 3:40 ` David Gibson
2016-10-06 3:38 ` David Gibson
2016-10-06 6:10 ` David Gibson
2016-10-06 11:03 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-06 14:11 ` Greg Kurz
2016-10-06 15:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-06 15:41 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-06 15:59 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-10-06 23:34 ` David Gibson
2016-10-07 7:44 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-10-06 15:44 ` Cédric Le Goater
2016-10-06 15:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-06 23:43 ` David Gibson
2016-10-06 23:31 ` David Gibson [this message]
2016-10-06 23:31 ` David Gibson
2016-10-07 9:52 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-04 23:26 ` David Gibson
2016-10-05 5:36 ` Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161006233148.GC18490@umbus.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).