From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv3ol-0004cx-4J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:50:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bv3oj-0002ZD-4F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:50:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:50:25 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20161014145025.GA17349@lemon> References: <1476380062-18001-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1476380062-18001-13-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1476380062-18001-13-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/18] iothread: detach all block devices before stopping them List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com On Thu, 10/13 19:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Soon bdrv_drain will not call aio_poll itself on iothreads. If block > devices are left hanging off the iothread's AioContext, there will be no > one to do I/O for those poor devices. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > --- > iothread.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/iothread.c b/iothread.c > index 62c8796..8153e21 100644 > --- a/iothread.c > +++ b/iothread.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include "qom/object_interfaces.h" > #include "qemu/module.h" > #include "block/aio.h" > +#include "block/block.h" > #include "sysemu/iothread.h" > #include "qmp-commands.h" > #include "qemu/error-report.h" > @@ -199,6 +200,15 @@ IOThreadInfoList *qmp_query_iothreads(Error **errp) > void iothread_stop_all(void) > { > Object *container = object_get_objects_root(); > + BlockDriverState *bs; > + BdrvNextIterator it; > + > + for (bs = bdrv_first(&it); bs; bs = bdrv_next(&it)) { > + AioContext *ctx = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs); I have a strong feeling that we should 'continue' if ctx == qemu_get_aio_context() - otherwise a lot of unnecessary (and somehow complicated) code will always run, even if user has no iothread. Fam > + aio_context_acquire(ctx); > + bdrv_set_aio_context(bs, qemu_get_aio_context()); > + aio_context_release(ctx); > + } > > object_child_foreach(container, iothread_stop, NULL); > } > -- > 2.7.4 > >