From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvu4p-00029m-GG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:38:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvu4k-0004ns-Jz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:38:43 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:57774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvu4k-0004nj-GF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:38:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:38:37 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20161016223837.GB5587@flamenco> References: <1476214861-31658-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1476214861-31658-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/35] cmpxchg-based emulation of atomics List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 14:40:26 -0500, Richard Henderson wrote: > Sixth time is the charm, right? This time I'm certain that it > compiles with centos6, and contains the previously missing update > from Emilio to atomic_add-bench. For patches 03-16 (including the elusive patch 06 for which I reviewed 1bfe0cdf8 from your atomic-4 branch on github): Reviewed-by: Emilio G. Cota I just tested the patchset by running concurrencykit's ck_pr regression test (which tests lock'ed ops) for [guest-on-host bits, all x86] 64-on-64, 32-on-32 and 64-on-32. I ran it with TCG debugging enabled. It passes all tests. I also checked (on x86_64 for several target architectures) that all patches build OK. Thanks, Emilio